Literature DB >> 3901773

Ankylosed teeth as abutments for maxillary protraction: a case report.

V G Kokich, P A Shapiro, R Oswald, L Koskinen-Moffett, S K Clarren.   

Abstract

It has been recognized that using the maxillary teeth to deliver extraoral force to the maxilla not only results in sutural remodeling but also periodontal remodeling and tooth movement. In patients with severe maxillomandibular malrelationships, the potential for tooth movement often limits the amount and duration of extraoral force and, consequently, affects the success of treatment. This case report describes a technique to intentionally ankylose deciduous teeth in a patient with severe maxillary retrusion. The ankylosed teeth were used as abutments to deliver an anteriorly directed intermittent extraoral force. After 12 months of treatment, the anterior crossbite was nearly corrected. At that point the ankylosed teeth loosened because of root resorption and the treatment was terminated. Cephalometric superimposition demonstrated that the occlusal correction was the result of anterior maxillary movement with little mandibular growth and no movement of the ankylosed teeth. The results suggest that intentionally ankylosed teeth may be used as abutments for extraoral traction in patients with a severe disturbance in maxillary growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3901773     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90129-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  20 in total

1.  Assessing bone volume for orthodontic miniplate fixation below the maxillary frontal process.

Authors:  T M Präger; H G Brochhagen; R Mischkowski; P-G Jost-Brinkmann; R Müller-Hartwich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Impairment of tooth eruption. Pathogenetic aspects.

Authors:  W Pytlik; G Alfter
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Ball Headed Mini Implant.

Authors:  N Raj Vikram; Ramachandra Prabhakar; S Aravind Kumar; M K Karthikeyan; R Saravanan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

4.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates.

Authors:  Gavin C Heymann; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie Cornelis; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Effects of facemask treatment anchored with miniplates after alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions; a pilot study.

Authors:  Demet Kaya; Ilken Kocadereli; Bahadir Kan; Ferda Tasar
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Orthopedic and Nonsurgical Orthodontic Treatment of Adolescent Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction and Temporary Anchorage Devices: A Case Report.

Authors:  Mohammed Alnefaie; Woo-Jin Han; Yoon-Soo Ahn; Won-Kyeong Baik; Sung-Hwan Choi
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07

7.  New treatment modality for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients. Protraction facemask with miniplate anchorage.

Authors:  Seung-Hak Baek; Keun-Woo Kim; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  The short-term treatment effects of face mask therapy in Class III patients based on the anchorage device: miniplates vs rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Nam-Ki Lee; Il-Hyung Yang; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Comparison of skeletal anchored facemask and tooth-borne facemask according to vertical skeletal pattern and growth stage.

Authors:  Sang-Duck Koh; Dong Hwa Chung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  The effects of face mask therapy in cleft lip and palate patients.

Authors:  Servet Dogan
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.