Literature DB >> 3901375

Continuous epidural infusion for analgesia after major abdominal operations: a randomized, prospective, double-blind study.

M L Cullen, E D Staren, A el-Ganzouri, W G Logas, A D Ivankovich, S G Economou.   

Abstract

We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of continuous epidural analgesia for 72 hours after major abdominal procedures. Patients were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups: epidural morphine, epidural bupivacaine, a combination of morphine and bupivacaine, epidural saline solution, and no epidural catheter. All patients received supplemental morphine sulfate or meperidine hydrochloride, intramuscularly or intravenously, as needed. Epidural infusion was begun at 2 to 4 ml/hr, depending on age and height, with two increments of 1 ml/hr allowed if pain relief was insufficient. All pain management decisions were made by nurses, who also monitored epidural function. Performance was measured four ways: pain as measured at regular intervals in the 72-hour period with a visual analog, pain as measured after 72 hours with the McGill Pain Questionnaire, amount of supplemental narcotics needed, and recovery of respiratory function and ambulation as percent of preoperative levels. The group that received the combination of morphine and bupivacaine did best on all measures; in most instances the difference between the results seen with the combination regimen and those seen with saline solution or no catheter were significant at the 0.05 level. With the exception of pruritus, complications were evenly distributed among all treatment groups, including noncatheterized controls. We conclude that epidural analgesia with the combination of morphine and bupivacaine is safe, is easily managed, and gives pain relief superior to that provided by traditional, systemic administration of narcotics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3901375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  12 in total

1.  Continuous epidural infusion for postoperative pain relief: a comparison of three regimens.

Authors:  S Sakura; H Uchida; Y Saito; M Asano; Y Kosaka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Respiratory depression associated with patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  W D Ngan Kee; K K Lam
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Bupivacaine 0.1% does not improve post-operative epidural fentanyl analgesia after abdominal or thoracic surgery.

Authors:  N H Badner; W E Komar
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  [The clinical use of spinal opioids, part 1].

Authors:  N Rawal
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1996-08-26       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 5.  [Cardioprotection by thoracic epidural anesthesia? : meta-analysis].

Authors:  A Gauss; S K Jahn; L H J Eberhart; W Stahl; M Rockemann; M Georgieff; F Wagner; R Meierhenrich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Peter Choi; Santhanam Suresh; Natalie Albert; Sandra Kopp; Nathan Leon Pace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-25

7.  Evaluation of the surgical factor in postoperative pain control.

Authors:  Mohamed E Shams; Hosam M Atef
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2010-09

8.  Bupivacaine 0.125% improves continuous postoperative epidural fentanyl analgesia after abdominal or thoracic surgery.

Authors:  N H Badner; R Bhandari; W E Komar
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Continuous epidural infusion for postoperative mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  S Sakura; M Sumi; Y Saito; J Koh; M Asano; A Tanaka; Y Kosaka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 10.  [Acute pain in surgery: the significance of a neglected problem].

Authors:  B M Ure; H Troidl; E Neugebauer; M Edelmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1992
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.