Literature DB >> 3900839

Effects of ultrasound feedback on pregnancy anxiety, fetal activity, and neonatal outcome.

T Field, D Sandberg, T A Quetel, R Garcia, M Rosario.   

Abstract

A group of pregnant women received video and verbal feedback during three ultrasound examinations. This group was compared with a no-feedback group on measures of pregnancy anxiety, fetal activity, and neonatal outcome. The feedback appeared to reduce pregnancy anxiety and fetal activity, particularly for the primiparous women. These women also experienced fewer obstetric complications and gave birth to neonates who were greater weight, more appropriate weight-for-length, less active and irritable, and showed better performance on the Brazelton neonatal behavior assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3900839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

1.  Fetal response to induced maternal emotions.

Authors:  Miyuki Araki; Shota Nishitani; Keisho Ushimaru; Hideaki Masuzaki; Kazuyo Oishi; Kazuyuki Shinohara
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 2.  Exposure to prenatal psychobiological stress exerts programming influences on the mother and her fetus.

Authors:  Curt A Sandman; Elysia P Davis; Claudia Buss; Laura M Glynn
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.914

3.  Dyadic Intervention during Pregnancy? Treating Pregnant Women and Possibly Reaching the Future Baby.

Authors:  Sharone Bergner; Catherine Monk; Elizabeth A Werner
Journal:  Infant Ment Health J       Date:  2008

4.  A randomised trial of three methods of giving information about prenatal testing.

Authors:  J G Thornton; J Hewison; R J Lilford; A Vail
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-28

Review 5.  High feedback versus low feedback of prenatal ultrasound for reducing maternal anxiety and improving maternal health behaviour in pregnancy.

Authors:  Ashraf F Nabhan; Nasreen Aflaifel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-04

6.  Maternal perspectives of prenatal sonogram in a north-eastern population in Nigeria.

Authors:  Ac Ugwu; Eo Osungbade; Fo Erondu
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.657

7.  QF2011: a protocol to study the effects of the Queensland flood on pregnant women, their pregnancies, and their children's early development.

Authors:  Suzanne King; Sue Kildea; Marie-Paule Austin; Alain Brunet; Vanessa E Cobham; Paul A Dawson; Mark Harris; Elizabeth M Hurrion; David P Laplante; Brett M McDermott; H David McIntyre; Michael W O'Hara; Norbert Schmitz; Helen Stapleton; Sally K Tracy; Cathy Vaillancourt; Kelsey N Dancause; Sue Kruske; Nicole Reilly; Laura Shoo; Gabrielle Simcock; Anne-Marie Turcotte-Tremblay; Erin Yong Ping
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Attachment Styles, Various Maternal Representations and A Bond to a Baby.

Authors:  Anna Zdolska-Wawrzkiewicz; Magdalena Chrzan-Dętkoś; Daria Pizuńska; Mariola Bidzan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The Fort McMurray Mommy Baby Study: A Protocol to Reduce Maternal Stress Due to the 2016 Fort McMurray Wood Buffalo, Alberta, Canada Wildfire.

Authors:  Ashley Hyde; Barbara S E Verstraeten; Joanne K Olson; Suzanne King; Suzette Brémault-Phillips; David M Olson
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.