Literature DB >> 3900106

Interference reflection microscopy in cell biology: methodology and applications.

H Verschueren.   

Abstract

Since its introduction into cell biology by Curtis in 1964, interference reflection microscopy (IRM) has been used by an increasing number of researchers to study cell-substrate interactions in living cells in culture. With the use of antiflex objectives, high-contrast IRM images can now be readily obtained. From the different theories on image formation in IRM that have been put forward, it can be seen that a zero-order interference pattern is generated at high illuminating numerical aperture. This yields information on the closeness of contact between cell and substrate, with only minor perturbation by reflections from the dorsal cell surface. Therefore, the proper use of illuminating apertures is crucial. Nevertheless, IRM images have to be interpreted with caution, especially under thin cytoplasmic sheets. Quantitative IRM is possible only with a mathematical model for finite illuminating aperture interferometry and with an independent measurement of cell thickness for values up to 1 micron. IRM has been applied qualitatively to a large number of cell types, and it seems that there are two universal types of adhesion. Focal contacts are small regions of closest cell-substrate apposition, possibly of immediate contact, that are associated with the distal end of actin filament bundles. They are firm attachment structures that hold the cell in place and in its spread shape. Close contacts are broad areas of reduced cell-to-substrate distance. They are weaker but highly dynamic adhesions that sustain rapid movements of cells or cell parts over the substrate. Although a number of independent observations suggest that adhesion patterns of malignantly transformed cells differ from those of their normal counterparts, there is no simple correlation between malignancy in vivo and altered contact formation in vitro. The adhesion pattern seems to be determined by the locomotory state of the cells rather than by their tissue of origin. Finally, IRM can also be used to enhance contrast in images of fixed preparations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3900106     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.75.1.279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  62 in total

1.  Cell membrane alignment along adhesive surfaces: contribution of active and passive cell processes.

Authors:  Anne Pierres; Philippe Eymeric; Emmanuelle Baloche; Dominique Touchard; Anne-Marie Benoliel; Pierre Bongrand
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Electrically excitable normal rat kidney fibroblasts: A new model system for cell-semiconductor hybrids.

Authors:  W J Parak; J Domke; M George; A Kardinal; M Radmacher; H E Gaub; A D de Roos; A P Theuvenet; G Wiegand; E Sackmann; J C Behrends
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Interaction of B-cell hybridomas with fibroblast or hepatocyte monolayers in vitro and their metastatic behaviour in vivo.

Authors:  S Verhaegen; H Verschueren; J Brissinck; D Van Hecke; D Dekegel; P De Baetselier
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Weak force stalls protrusion at the leading edge of the lamellipodium.

Authors:  Sophie Bohnet; Revathi Ananthakrishnan; Alex Mogilner; Jean-Jacques Meister; Alexander B Verkhovsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  An adhesion molecule in free-living Dictyostelium amoebae with integrin beta features.

Authors:  Sophie Cornillon; Leigh Gebbie; Mohammed Benghezal; Prashant Nair; Sebastien Keller; Bernhard Wehrle-Haller; Steve J Charette; Franz Brückert; François Letourneur; Pierre Cosson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  How cells tiptoe on adhesive surfaces before sticking.

Authors:  Anne Pierres; Anne-Marie Benoliel; Dominique Touchard; Pierre Bongrand
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Neurite branch retraction is caused by a threshold-dependent mechanical impact.

Authors:  Kristian Franze; Jens Gerdelmann; Michael Weick; Timo Betz; Steve Pawlizak; Melike Lakadamyali; Johannes Bayer; Katja Rillich; Michael Gögler; Yun-Bi Lu; Andreas Reichenbach; Paul Janmey; Josef Käs
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Reflection contrast microscopy within chrome-alum haematoxylin stained thick tissue-sections.

Authors:  T J Filler; C H Rickert; U K Fassnacht; F Pera
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1994-06

9.  Interference reflection microscopy.

Authors:  Valarie A Barr; Stephen C Bunnell
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cell Biol       Date:  2009-12

10.  Cell-substrate interactions and locomotion of Dictyostelium wild-type and mutants defective in three cytoskeletal proteins: a study using quantitative reflection interference contrast microscopy.

Authors:  M Schindl; E Wallraff; B Deubzer; W Witke; G Gerisch; E Sackmann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.