Literature DB >> 3899503

Relative potency of progestins used in oral contraceptives.

L J Dorflinger.   

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies indicate that the risk of complications with oral contraceptive use is related to the steroid content and potency of the various formulations. This paper summarizes human data in which potencies of progestins in oral contraceptives can be compared. Data on delay of menses and endometrial subnuclear vacuolization, an indirect assessment of glycogen deposition, are presented. The relative effects of various progestins on serum lipids and lipoproteins are also summarized. The object of this review is to examine the available scientific evidence which generally supports the conclusion that there is a marked similarity of potency of the dose of various progestins used in many of the formulations currently available in the U.S. The progestins norethindrone, norethindrone acetate and ethynodiol diacetate are roughly equivalent in potency while norgestrel is roughly five to ten times and levonorgestrel ten to 20 times as potent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents, Female--side effects; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin--side effects; Contraceptive Agents--side effects; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Diseases; Endocrine System; Evaluation; Family Planning; Hormones; Levonorgestrel--side effects; Lipid Metabolic Effects; Lipids; Literature Review; Metabolic Effects; Norethindrone Acetate--side effects; Norethindrone--side effects; Norgestrel--side effects; Oral Contraceptives, Low-dose; Oral Contraceptives--side effects; Physiology; Progestins, Low-dose; Reproductive Control Agents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3899503     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(85)90056-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  8 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetics and potency of progestins used for hormone replacement therapy and contraception.

Authors:  Frank Z Stanczyk
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Oral contraceptive formulation and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Polly A Marchbanks; Kathryn M Curtis; Michele G Mandel; Hoyt G Wilson; Gary Jeng; Suzanne G Folger; Jill A McDonald; Janet R Daling; Leslie Bernstein; Kathleen E Malone; Phyllis A Wingo; Michael S Simon; Sandra A Norman; Brian L Strom; Giske Ursin; Linda K Weiss; Ronald T Burkman; Robert Spirtas
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Trends in the content and use of oral contraceptives in the United States, 1964-88.

Authors:  B B Gerstman; T P Gross; D L Kennedy; R C Bennett; D K Tomita; B V Stadel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Progestogens used in postmenopausal hormone therapy: differences in their pharmacological properties, intracellular actions, and clinical effects.

Authors:  Frank Z Stanczyk; Janet P Hapgood; Sharon Winer; Daniel R Mishell
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer: a prospective study of young women.

Authors:  David J Hunter; Graham A Colditz; Susan E Hankinson; Susan Malspeis; Donna Spiegelman; Wendy Chen; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Recency, duration, and progestin content of oral contraceptives in relation to the incidence of endometrial cancer (Washington, USA).

Authors:  L F Voigt; Q Deng; N S Weiss
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Progestogen use and decreased risk of breast cancer in a cohort study of premenopausal women with benign breast disease.

Authors:  G Plu-Bureau; M G Lê; R Sitruk-Ware; J C Thalabard; P Mauvais-Jarvis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Hormonal content and potency of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk among young women.

Authors:  M D Althuis; D R Brogan; R J Coates; J R Daling; M D Gammon; K E Malone; J B Schoenberg; L A Brinton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-01-13       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.