Literature DB >> 3899497

Hearing in two cricetid rodents: wood rat (Neotoma floridana) and grasshopper mouse (Onychomys leucogaster).

H E Heffner, R S Heffner.   

Abstract

The audiograms of two wood rats and three grasshopper mice were determined with a conditioned avoidance procedure. The wood rats were able to hear tones from 940 Hz to 56 kHz at a level of 60 dB (SPL), with their best sensitivity of -3 dB occurring at 8 kHz. The hearing of the grasshopper mice ranged from 1.85 kHz to 69 kHz at 60 dB (SPL), with their best sensitivity of 9 dB also occurring at 8 kHz. These results support the relation between interaural distance and high-frequency hearing and between high- and low-frequency hearing. The inability of the grasshopper mouse to hear low frequencies as well as other desert rodents such as kangaroo rats and gerbils demonstrates that not all rodents found in deserts have developed good low-frequency hearing. The degree to which general and specific selective pressures have played a role in the evolution of rodent hearing is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3899497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  10 in total

1.  Volumes of cochlear nucleus regions in rodents.

Authors:  Donald A Godfrey; Augustine C Lee; Walter D Hamilton; Louis C Benjamin; Shilpa Vishwanath; Hermann Simo; Lynn M Godfrey; Abdurrahman I A A Mustapha; Rickye S Heffner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Thermocron iButton and iBBat temperature dataloggers emit ultrasound.

Authors:  Craig K R Willis; Joel W Jameson; Paul A Faure; Justin G Boyles; Virgil Brack; Tom H Cervone
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Evoked Response Strength in Primary Auditory Cortex Predicts Performance in a Spectro-Spatial Discrimination Task in Rats.

Authors:  Elena Gronskaya; Wolfger von der Behrens
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A broad filter between call frequency and peripheral auditory sensitivity in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster).

Authors:  Dana M Green; Tucker Scolman; O'neil W Guthrie; Bret Pasch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Tympanic and extratympanic sound transmission in the leopard frog.

Authors:  W Wilczynski; C Resler; R R Capranica
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Organization of somatosensory cortex in the Northern grasshopper mouse (Onychomys leucogaster), a predatory rodent.

Authors:  Diana K Sarko; Duncan B Leitch; Isabelle Girard; Robert S Sikes; Kenneth C Catania
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 7.  Structure and function of the mammalian middle ear. II: Inferring function from structure.

Authors:  Matthew J Mason
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Hearing in coruros (Spalacopus cyanus): special audiogram features of a subterranean rodent.

Authors:  Sabine Begall; Hynek Burda; Bianca Schneider
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Camera traps can be heard and seen by animals.

Authors:  Paul D Meek; Guy-Anthony Ballard; Peter J S Fleming; Michael Schaefer; Warwick Williams; Greg Falzon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  It's not black or white-on the range of vision and echolocation in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Arjan Boonman; Yinon Bar-On; Noam Cvikel; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.566

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.