Literature DB >> 3899470

Whole-bowel irrigation for mechanical colon cleansing.

K A Michael, J T DiPiro, T A Bowden, F J Tedesco.   

Abstract

The physiology, solution composition, indications, efficacy, and safety of whole-bowel irrigation (WBI) for mechanical bowel cleansing are reviewed. WBI with isotonic electrolyte solutions produces diarrhea when the infusion rate exceeds the capacity of the intestine to distend and absorb the solution. A number of solutions are used for WBI, including 0.9% sodium chloride, balanced electrolyte solutions, lactated Ringer's, mannitol, and electrolyte solutions containing polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG). WBI solution administration rates vary from 15-90 mL/min, by oral ingestion or nasogastric tube, with total volumes ranging from 1 to 20 L. The onset of diarrhea occurs as soon as 20 minutes with clearing of the effluent as early as 90 minutes. Faster administration rates appear to shorten overall cleansing time. Two PEG-electrolyte lavage solutions (ELSs) have recently gained FDA approval. The recommended dosage rate is 1.2-1.8 L/hr orally or by nasogastric tube until rectal effluent is clear. In most patients, this requires a maximum of 4-6 L. Initial data indicate that PEG-ELSs are safe for elderly patients and for patients who have an increased risk of fluid overload, but these solutions have not been evaluated in children, pregnant women, or patients with inflammatory bowel disease. WBI is an effective alternative to other regimens for removing fecal material and reducing bowel lumen bacterial counts before colonoscopy and colorectal surgery. Retention of bacterial counts before colonoscopy and colorectal surgery. Retention of excess WBI solution may interfere with the quality of barium enema radiographs; this can be minimized by completing the irrigation the evening before the examination. Gastrointestinal side effects occur in about one third of the patients following WBI, but do not generally require discontinuing the irrigation. Solutions containing PEG with sodium sulfate as the primary electrolyte result in the least net water and electrolyte movement and are preferred over other solutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3899470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharm        ISSN: 0278-2677


  5 in total

1.  The impact of advances in instrumentation and techniques of colonoscopy from 1988 to 2008 on inpatient colonoscopy performance at a high volume endoscopy unit in the United States: significantly shorter procedure time, higher completion rate, performance on sicker inpatients, and near disappearance of flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell; Rami Abboud
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Whole bowel irrigation as a gastrointestinal decontamination procedure after acute poisoning.

Authors:  M Tenenbein
Journal:  Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr

3.  Oral bowel lavage preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  D A Burke; A P Manning; L Murphy; A T Axon
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  A low-volume polyethylene glycol solution was associated with an increased suboptimal bowel preparation rate but had similar recommendations for an early repeat colonoscopy, procedure times, and adenoma detection rates.

Authors:  Sam C Hankins; Bryan B Brimhall; Vineel Kankanala; Gregory L Austin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Efficacy of 1.2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparations.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tamaki; Teruyo Noda; Masahiro Morita; Akina Omura; Atsushi Kubo; Chikara Ogawa; Toshihiro Matsunaka; Mitsushige Shibatoge
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.