Literature DB >> 3896556

Early detection of cardiac allograft rejection with proton nuclear magnetic resonance.

S Sasaguri, P J LaRaia, B M Fabri, J T Fallon, C A Ayelsworth, M N D'Ambra, J B Newell, T J Brady, M J Buckley.   

Abstract

No reliable, noninvasive technique is currently available for the early detection of cardiac transplant rejection. In this study, pulse nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used (20 MHz) to detect cardiac allograft rejection in rats. Proton spin-lattice relaxation time (T1), proton spin-spin relaxation time (T2), and water content were measured in both recipient and donor hearts at 2, 4, 6, and 8 days after transplantation. Pathologic specimens were scored on a 0 to 4+ scale of increasing evidence of rejection by light microscopy. Three kinds of heterotopic transplants were performed for a total of 90: (1) Lewis rats received Lewis rat isografts, (2) Lewis rats received Brown Norway rat allografts, and (3) Lewis rats received cyclosporin A-treated allografts (15 mg/kg/day). T1 in group 2 was significantly higher than that in group 1 as early as day 2 (670 + 25 vs 616 + 11 msec, p less than .001), when histologic scores were not different. T2 in group 2 was also higher than that in group 1 (48.0 +/- 5.0 vs 41.1 +/- 2.6, p less than .005). T1 and T2 in group 2 increased from day 4 and correlated well with the water content of the hearts (r = .70 and r = .75, respectively). Cyclosporin A completely suppressed the increase of T1 and T2 in group 2. Treatment with cyclosporin also suppressed the histologic rejection scores. Our data suggest that proton relaxation time measurement may be a sensitive technique for detecting the onset of rejection and examining the therapeutic effects of cyclosporin. NMR imaging, which highlights T1 and T2 separately, should provide a sensitive noninvasive means of assessing myocardial graft rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3896556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of myocardial perfusion and rejection in cardiac transplant patients.

Authors:  Andrew L Rivard; Cory M Swingen; Donnevan Blake; Andrea S Huang; Pooja Kanth; Grete F Thomsen; Erin J Cordova; Leslie W Miller; Richard W Bianco; Norbert Wilke
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Jun Zheng; Xu-Dong Pan; Ming-Duo Zhang; Tie-Yuan Zhu; Bin Li; Li-Zhong Sun
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Cardiac transplantation in dogs: evaluation with gated MRI and Gd-DTPA contrast enhancement.

Authors:  T Nishimura; M Sada; H Sasaki; H Amemiya; T Kozuka; T Fujita; T Akutsu; H Manabe
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Breathhold multiecho fast spin-echo pulse sequence for accurate R2 measurement in the heart and liver.

Authors:  Daniel Kim; Jens H Jensen; Ed X Wu; Sujit S Sheth; Gary M Brittenham
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of acute heart transplant rejection: a review.

Authors:  Craig R Butler; Richard Thompson; Mark Haykowsky; Mustafa Toma; Ian Paterson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Relation between myocardial edema and myocardial mass during the acute and convalescent phase of myocarditis--a CMR study.

Authors:  Anja Zagrosek; Ralf Wassmuth; Hassan Abdel-Aty; André Rudolph; Rainer Dietz; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 5.364

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.