Literature DB >> 3894024

DNA methylation of bacterial viruses T3 and T7 by different DNA methylases in Escherichia coli K12 cells.

D H Krüger, C Schroeder, M Reuter, I G Bogdarina, Y I Buryanov, T A Bickle.   

Abstract

We have investigated the susceptibility of the genomes of the related bacteriophages T3 and T7 to the three major DNA methyltransferases (EcoK, dam, dcm) of their host, Escherichia coli K12. In vivo the EcoK host specificity enzyme only methylates the DNA of ocr- phages. This is due to an inhibition of the enzyme by the phage ocr+ gene product, which had previously been shown to be an inhibitor of the restriction endonuclease. EcoK-specific DNA methylation protects the ocr- viruses after one growth cycle on these host cells against the action of corresponding restriction endonuclease EcoK. Owing to the unique S-adenosyl-L-methionine hydrolase (sam+) activity of the T3-coded ocr+ protein, the T3 DNA is absolutely devoid of the methylated bases 6-methylaminopurine and 5-methylcytosine. In contrast to this, T7 derivatives and sam- derivatives of T3 carry a small number of about 2-4 molecules 6-methylaminopurine and 5-methylcytosine per genome. The presence of 6-methylaminopurine is due to dam methylation, though the majority of dam sites remain unmethylated. In vivo as well as in vitro the ocr+ protein has no influence on the activities of the dam and dcm methylase. The experiments gave some evidence for the existence of a second cytosine methylase in E. coli K12. Besides dam and dcm recognition sites being undermethylated, their absolute number in T3 and T7 DNAs is far below the expected value. Moreover, one of the two dcm sites present in T7 (Studier strain) is missing in our T7 strain owing to a 1300-base-pair deletion in gene 0.7.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3894024     DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb09024.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Biochem        ISSN: 0014-2956


  15 in total

1.  Counterselection of GATC sequences in enterobacteriophages by the components of the methyl-directed mismatch repair system.

Authors:  P Deschavanne; M Radman
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  Diverse functions of restriction-modification systems in addition to cellular defense.

Authors:  Kommireddy Vasu; Valakunja Nagaraja
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 3.  Avoidance of DNA methylation. A virus-encoded methylase inhibitor and evidence for counterselection of methylase recognition sites in viral genomes.

Authors:  D H Krüger; C Schroeder; M Santibanez-Koref; M Reuter
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1989 Aug-Oct

4.  EcoRII can be activated to cleave refractory DNA recognition sites.

Authors:  D H Krüger; G J Barcak; M Reuter; H O Smith
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  DNA methylation. The effect of minor bases on DNA-protein interactions.

Authors:  R L Adams
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1990-01-15       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  A motif conserved among the type I restriction-modification enzymes and antirestriction proteins: a possible basis for mechanism of action of plasmid-encoded antirestriction functions.

Authors:  A A Belogurov; E P Delver
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-03-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Biology of DNA restriction.

Authors:  T A Bickle; D H Krüger
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-06

8.  Repair-modification and evolution of the eukaryotic genome organization.

Authors:  P Volpe; T Eremenko
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1989 Aug-Oct

Review 9.  Conflicts targeting epigenetic systems and their resolution by cell death: novel concepts for methyl-specific and other restriction systems.

Authors:  Ken Ishikawa; Eri Fukuda; Ichizo Kobayashi
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Activation of restriction endonuclease EcoRII does not depend on the cleavage of stimulator DNA.

Authors:  C D Pein; M Reuter; A Meisel; D Cech; D H Krüger
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.