Literature DB >> 3888688

Birth spacing and fertility limitation: a behavioral analysis of a nineteenth century frontier population.

D L Anderton, L L Bean.   

Abstract

Our analysis of changing birth interval distributions over the course of a fertility transition from natural to controlled fertility has examined three closely related propositions. First, within both natural fertility populations (identified at the aggregate level) and cohorts following the onset of fertility limitation, we hypothesized that substantial groups of women with long birth intervals across the individually specified childbearing careers could be identified. That is, even during periods when fertility behavior at the aggregate level is consistent with a natural fertility regime, birth intervals at all parities are inversely related to completed family size. Our tabular analysis enables us to conclude that birth spacing patterns are parity dependent; there is stability in CEB-parity specific mean and birth interval variance over the entire transition. Our evidence does not suggest that the early group of women limiting and spacing births was marked by infecundity. Secondly, the transition appears to be associated with an increasingly larger proportion of women shifting to the same spacing schedules associated with smaller families in earlier cohorts. Thirdly, variations in birth spacing by age of marriage indicate that changes in birth intervals over time are at least indirectly associated with age of marriage, indicating an additional compositional effect. The evidence we have presented on spacing behavior does not negate the argument that parity-dependent stopping behavior was a powerful factor in the fertility transition. Our data also provide evidence of attempts to truncate childbearing. Specifically, the smaller the completed family size, the longer the ultimate birth interval; and ultimate birth intervals increase across cohorts controlling CEB and parity. But spacing appears to represent an additional strategy of fertility limitation. Thus, it may be necessary to distinguish spacing and stopping behavior if one wishes to clarify behavioral patterns within a population (Edlefsen, 1981; Friedlander et al., 1980; Rodriguez and Hobcraft, 1980). Because fertility transition theories imply increased attempts to limit family sizes, it is important to examine differential behavior within subgroups achieving different family sizes. It is this level of analysis which we have attempted to achieve in utilizing parity-specific birth intervals controlled by children ever born.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3888688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demography        ISSN: 0070-3370


  23 in total

1.  Technical note: finding the two parameters that specify a model schedule of marital fertility.

Authors:  A J Coale; T J Trussell
Journal:  Popul Index       Date:  1978

2.  Truncation effect in closed and open birth interval data.

Authors:  M C Sheps; J A Menken; J C Ridley; J W Lingner
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  [Not Available].

Authors:  J Dupâquier; M Lachiver
Journal:  Ann Econ Soc Civilis       Date:  1981

4.  Mormon demographic history I. Nuptiality and fertility of once-married couples.

Authors:  M Skolnick; L Bean; D May; V Arbon; K De Nevers; P Cartwright
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1978-03

5.  The decline of fertility: Innovation or adjustment process.

Authors:  G Carlsson
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1966-11

6.  From natural fertility to family limitation: the onset of fertility transition in a sample of German villages.

Authors:  J Knodel
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1979-11

7.  A specification of marital fertility by parents' age, age at marriage and marital duration.

Authors:  G P Mineau; J Trussell
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1982-08

8.  A macrosimulation approach to the investigation of natural fertility.

Authors:  J D Willigan; G P Mineau; D L Anderton; L L Bean
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1982-05

9.  Age and marital status at first birth and the pace of subsequent fertility.

Authors:  L L Bumpass; R R Rindfuss; R B Janosik
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1978-02

10.  Effects of the timing of marriage and first birth of the spacing of subsequent births.

Authors:  M M Marini; P J Hodsdon
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1981-11
View more
  15 in total

1.  Fertility and culture in Eastern Europe: a case study of Riga, Latvia, 1867-1881.

Authors:  C Wetherell; A Plakans
Journal:  Eur J Popul       Date:  1997

Review 2.  Fertility transition, conscious choice, and numeracy.

Authors:  E van de Walle
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1992-11

3.  The Phoenix population: demographic crisis and rebound in Cambodia.

Authors:  Patrick Heuveline; Bunnak Poch
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2007-05

4.  American fertility in transition: new estimates of birth rates in the United States, 1900-1910.

Authors:  M R Haines
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1989-02

5.  Comment on Knodel's "Starting, Stopping, and Spacing During the Early Stages of Fertility Transition".

Authors:  D L Anderton
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1989-08

6.  Estimating birth stopping and spacing behavior.

Authors:  D C Ewbank
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1989-08

7.  Starting, stopping, and spacing during the early stages of fertility transition: the experience of German village populations in the 18th and 19th centuries.

Authors:  J Knodel
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1987-05

Review 8.  Intergenerational transmission of relative fertility and life course patterns.

Authors:  D L Anderton; N O Tsuya; L L Bean; G P Mineau
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1987-11

9.  Further Evidence of Within-Marriage Fertility Control in Pre-Transitional England.

Authors:  Francesco Cinnirella; Marc Klemp; Jacob Weisdorf
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2019-08

10.  The marginal valuation of fertility.

Authors:  James Holland Jones; Rebecca Bliege Bird
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.178

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.