Literature DB >> 3888169

Evaluation of antimotion sickness drug side effects on performance.

C D Wood, J E Manno, B R Manno, H M Redetzki, M J Wood, M E Mims.   

Abstract

This project has employed a computerized pursuit meter which has a high correlation with operational performance (2) to test the principal antimotion sickness drugs. Proficiency scores on the pursuit meter task were improved over placebo scores in subjects with d-amphetamine 10 mg and 5 mg, the combination of promethazine 25 mg plus scopolamine 0.4 mg with d-amphetamine 10 mg, and the combination of scopolamine 1 mg with d-amphetamine 10 mg. Scores were not significantly different from placebo scores in tests with scopolamine 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, or 0.6 mg; marezine 50 mg; meclizine 50 mg; or dimenhydrinate 50 mg. This was also true for the combination of scopolamine 1 mg with d-amphetamine 5 mg, and that of promethazine 25 mg with d-amphetamine 10 mg. A statistically significant decrement of performance scores was seen with scopolamine 1 mg or 0.8 mg, and with promethazine 25 mg oral or 25 mg I.M. The combination of promethazine 25 mg with scopolamein 0.4 mg, and that of promethazine 25 mg oral plus 25 mg I.M. with d-amphetamine 10 mg, also gave significant decrements from placebo scores. These results indicate that selected doses and combinations of antimotion sickness drugs can be used without loss of operational proficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3888169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  6 in total

1.  The relation of motion sickness to the spatial-temporal properties of velocity storage.

Authors:  Mingjia Dai; Mikhail Kunin; Theodore Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visually-induced tilt during parabolic flights.

Authors:  B S Cheung; I P Howard; K E Money
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Promethazine, scopolamine and cinnarizine: comparative time course of psychological performance effects.

Authors:  A C Parrott; K Wesnes
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Performance tests.

Authors:  A Wetherell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  The Impact of Oral Promethazine on Human Whole-Body Motion Perceptual Thresholds.

Authors:  Ana Diaz-Artiles; Adrian J Priesol; Torin K Clark; David P Sherwood; Charles M Oman; Laurence R Young; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-24

6.  Scopolamine Reduces Electrophysiological Indices of Distractor Suppression: Evidence from a Contingent Capture Task.

Authors:  Inga Laube; Natasha Matthews; Angela J Dean; Redmond G O'Connell; Jason B Mattingley; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.492

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.