Literature DB >> 3884523

Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli.

I Nachshon.   

Abstract

The present paper reviews a series of studies regarding the effects of hemispheric asymmetry and reading and writing habits on directional preferences in reproducing horizontally-displayed visual stimuli. Hebrew readers, English readers, and Arabic readers were presented with arrays of horizontally-displayed directional and nondirectional stimuli, as well as with single stimuli. They were asked to reproduce the stimuli, and the direction of their reproduction, left-right or right-left, was recorded for analysis. Generally, in reproducing arrays of stimuli, English readers showed left-right directionality, whereas Hebrew readers showed right-left directionality. But in reproducing arrays of English and Hebrew letters, subjects of both groups showed left-right and right-left preferences, respectively. However, the right-left directional preferences shown by Hebrew readers were weaker than the left-right preferences shown by English readers. It was hypothesized that these differences are due to differential reading and writing habits acquired in school by English- and Hebrew-readers. In support of the reading and writing habit hypothesis, it was subsequently found that: (a) Arabic readers, who have stronger right-left reading and writing habits than Hebrew readers, show relatively stronger right-left directional preferences, and (b) with the introduction of English as a foreign language in the fifth grade, children show an increase in left-right directionality. Further investigation showed that, depending on the experimental conditions, directional preferences may be a function of either reading and writing habits, or hemispheric asymmetry, or both. Finally, the bearing of these findings on the "nature-nurture" controversy regarding the development of perceptual exploration in children is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3884523     DOI: 10.3109/00207458508985369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neurosci        ISSN: 0020-7454            Impact factor:   2.292


  6 in total

Review 1.  Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Spatial biases in understanding descriptions of static scenes: the role of reading and writing direction.

Authors:  Antonio Román; Abderrahman El Fathi; Julio Santiago
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-05

3.  Visual Benefits in Apparent Motion Displays: Automatically Driven Spatial and Temporal Anticipation Are Partially Dissociated.

Authors:  Merle-Marie Ahrens; Domenica Veniero; Joachim Gross; Monika Harvey; Gregor Thut
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The SNARC Effect in Number Memorization and Retrieval. What is the Impact of Congruency, Magnitude and the Exact Position of Numbers in Short-Term Memory Processing?

Authors:  Małgorzata Gut; Rafał Staniszewski
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-12-31

5.  The Influence of Language on Spatial Reasoning: Reading Habits Modulate the Formulation of Conclusions and the Integration of Premises.

Authors:  Thomas Castelain; Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-17

6.  Reading direction causes spatial biases in mental model construction in language understanding.

Authors:  Antonio Román; Andrea Flumini; Pilar Lizano; Marysol Escobar; Julio Santiago
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.