Literature DB >> 3882267

Digital subtraction fluoroscopy: a new method of detecting coronary calcifications with improved sensitivity for the prediction of coronary disease.

R Detrano, D Markovic, C Simpfendorfer, I Franco, J Hollman, F Grigera, W Stewart, N Ratcliff, E E Salcedo, J Leatherman.   

Abstract

The association between calcification of the coronary arteries and coronary artery narrowing is well established. However, fluoroscopic visualization of coronary calcifications has been insufficiently sensitive to be useful as a screening test. Since digitization of radiographic images permits the subtraction of noncardiac structures from moving cardiac structures, such subtraction might increase the sensitivity of coronary fluoroscopy. To determine whether coronary calcifications were better visualized with digital subtraction fluoroscopy than with conventional fluoroscopy, we taped diseased human coronary arteries to a pulsating water balloon inside the thorax of a dog cadaver and studied this model with both fluoroscopic techniques. Calcific atherosclerotic plaques were more easily identified with digital subtraction fluoroscopy than with conventional fluoroscopy. We tested the method clinically by submitting 191 subjects without history or electrocardiographic evidence of previous myocardial infarction who were referred for coronary arteriography to both fluoroscopic studies. For at least one, at least two, and three calcified coronary arteries, digital fluoroscopy was more sensitive (92%, 66%, and 40%) than conventional fluoroscopy (63%, 21%, and 2%) (all p less than .001) for the prediction of significant coronary obstructions (greater than 50%). Although digital fluoroscopy was less specific than conventional fluoroscopy (digital: 65%, 89%, and 97%; conventional: 81%, 98%, and 100%) (all but last, p less than .01), receiver operating curve analysis revealed a significantly larger area under the curve, indicating higher accuracy for the digital technique (p = .03). Digital subtraction fluoroscopy was more accurate in younger than in older patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3882267     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.71.4.725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  6 in total

Review 1.  Coronary Calcium Score and Cardiovascular Risk.

Authors:  Philip Greenland; Michael J Blaha; Matthew J Budoff; Raimund Erbel; Karol E Watson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Update on using coronary calcium screening by computed tomography to measure risk for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Brad H Thompson; William Stanford
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Radiographically detectable calcium and atherosclerosis: the connection and its exploitation.

Authors:  R Detrano; S Molloi
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

Review 4.  Coronary arterial calcification as an active process: a new perspective on an old problem.

Authors:  T M Doherty; R C Detrano
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Reproducibility of coronary calcification detection with electron-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  A Hernigou; P Challande; J C Boudeville; V Sènè; C Grataloup; M C Plainfossè
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Coronary Calcium Scanning in Patients after Adjuvant Radiation for Early Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In situ.

Authors:  Monique Chang; Jason Suh; Vatsala Kirtani; Andrei Dobrescu; Jonathan Haas; Steven Zeldis; Steven Shayani; Alexander A Hindenburg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.