Literature DB >> 3881445

A roentgenographic, biomechanical, and histological evaluation of vascularized and non-vascularized segmental fibular canine autografts.

P C Dell, H Burchardt, F P Glowczewskie.   

Abstract

Advocates of vascularized bone grafts believe that these grafts should have a decreased time to graft-host union, and that they should be mechanically stronger than conventional (non-vascularized) grafts. The objectives of the present study were to determine the rate and pattern of repair in vascularized autogenous cortical bone grafts, to determine the mechanical strength of the grafts, and to correlate the mechanical strength with the biological repair. Forty-nine adult male mongrel dogs were divided into six groups to evaluate conventional (non-vascularized), cuff (periosteal-encased, non-vascularized), and vascularized segmental grafts. The fibula was the site of experimentation and all grafts were four-centimeter cortical segments. The vascularized and conventional grafts were analyzed at two, six, twelve, and twenty-four weeks. The cuff grafts were analyzed at twenty-four weeks and were compared with conventional grafts to assess the effect of the periosteal soft tissue. Roentgenograms were made every two weeks to evaluate the time to union. The mechanical strength of each graft was assessed by determining rapid torsional load to failure. Biological repair was assessed by tetracycline labeling for new-bone formation and by microradiographic techniques for porosity and cross-sectional areas. The study showed that conventional and cuff grafts were similar in terms of mechanical and biological repair at six months. At all sampling intervals, the vascularized grafts exhibited histological findings that were consistent with viability. The conventional and vascularized grafts underwent different mechanisms of repair. The conventional, non-vascularized grafts healed by peripheral and internal resorption followed by callus encasement and osteonal remodeling.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3881445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  17 in total

1.  Bone grafts in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Mohammed E Elsalanty; David G Genecov
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-10

2.  Treatment of benign lesions of humerus with resection and non-vascularised, autologous fibular graft.

Authors:  Andrzej Grzegorzewski; Ewa Pogonowicz; Marcin Sibinski; Marek Marciniak; Marek Synder
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Autologous bone graft harvesting: a review of grafts and surgical techniques.

Authors:  A M Jakoi; J A Iorio; P J Cahill
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2015-04-07

4.  Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Fa-Ming Chen; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 29.190

Review 5.  Vascularized versus Nonvascularized Bone Grafts: What Is the Evidence?

Authors:  Bradley J Allsopp; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren M Rozen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Segmental bone grafting. Comparison of different types of graft in dogs.

Authors:  M Aebi; P Regazzoni; O Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Massive bone allografts in large skeletal defects after tumor surgery: a clinical and microradiographic evaluation.

Authors:  C Delloye; P de Nayer; N Allington; E Munting; L Coutelier; A Vincent
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1988

8.  3D printed hyperelastic "bone" scaffolds and regional gene therapy: A novel approach to bone healing.

Authors:  Ram Alluri; Adam Jakus; Sofia Bougioukli; William Pannell; Osamu Sugiyama; Amy Tang; Ramille Shah; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Bony Hypertrophy in Vascularized Fibular Grafts.

Authors:  Lewis L Shi; Rohit Garg; Andrew Jawa; Qiaojie Wang; Yimin Chai; Bingfang Zeng; Jesse B Jupiter
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 10.  Substitutes of structural and non-structural autologous bone grafts in hindfoot arthrodeses and osteotomies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marc Andreas Müller; Alexander Frank; Matthias Briel; Victor Valderrabano; Patrick Vavken; Vahid Entezari; Arne Mehrkens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.