Literature DB >> 3880660

Improved control of cisplatin-induced emesis with high-dose metoclopramide and with combinations of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and diphenhydramine. Results of consecutive trials in 255 patients.

M G Kris, R J Gralla, L B Tyson, R A Clark, D P Kelsen, L K Reilly, S Groshen, G J Bosl, L A Kalman.   

Abstract

A series of consecutive trials were undertaken to determine whether higher doses of intravenous metoclopramide and combinations of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and diphenhydramine would improve antiemetic control or decrease treatment-related side effects in patients receiving cisplatin at 120 mg/m2. Metoclopramide and dexamethasone were studied because of their proven efficacy as single agents and their differing mechanisms of action and side effects. Diphenhydramine was used because of its possible antiemetic properties and its ability to control acute dystonic reactions. Two hundred fifty-five patients who had never received chemotherapy or antiemetics were observed in the hospital for the 24 hours following cisplatin administration. The addition of dexamethasone or dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine to intravenous metoclopramide 2 mg/kg produced both improved antiemetic control and a decrease in treatment-associated diarrhea (P = 0.002). The use of metoclopramide alone at a dose of 3 mg/kg for only two doses appeared as effective as 2 mg/kg for five doses. When dexamethasone and diphenhydramine were given with metoclopramide 3 mg/kg for two intravenous dosages, 81% of patients experienced no emesis and 93% had two or fewer vomiting episodes. The antiemetic results of this 2-hour "short-course" regimen were superior to metoclopramide 2 mg/kg, with (P = 0.002) or without (P = 0.0001) dexamethasone and diphenhydramine. It was concluded that combinations of metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine improve antiemetic control, facilitate the usage of higher doses of metoclopramide, and decrease the incidence of treatment-related side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3880660     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850201)55:3<527::aid-cncr2820550310>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  38 in total

Review 1.  Myths and realities of antiemetic treatment.

Authors:  M Martin
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1992-12

2.  GR38032F, a 5HT3 receptor antagonist, in the prophylaxis of acute cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  M Marty; J P Droz; P Pouillart; B Paule; N Brion; J Bons
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  A phase I/II study of the 5-HT3 antagonist GR38032F in the anti-emetic prophylaxis of patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy.

Authors:  D B Smith; E S Newlands; G J Rustin; R H Begent; S M Crawford; K D Bagshawe; L Carruthers
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Continuous infusion of high-dose metoclopramide: comparison of pharmacokinetically adjusted and standard doses for the control of cisplatin-induced acute emesis.

Authors:  J M Brechot; J P Dupeyron; C Delattre; C Chastang; J P Laaban; J Rochemaure
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Granisetron. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use as an antiemetic.

Authors:  G L Plosker; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  A double-blind, multicentre comparison of intravenous dolasetron mesilate and metoclopramide in the prevention of nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy.

Authors:  B Chevallier; P Cappelaere; T Splinter; M Fabbro; J L Wendling; L Cals; G Catimel; M Giovannini; D Khayat; P Bastit; N Claverie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Pharmacological Agents Affecting Emesis : A Review (Part II).

Authors:  F Mitchelson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Antiemetics in cancer chemotherapy: historical perspective and current state of the art.

Authors:  M Tonato; F Roila; A Del Favero; E Ballatori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Delayed emesis: a dilemma in antiemetic control.

Authors:  R A Clark; R J Gralla
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Progress in controlling emesis with cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  R J Gralla; R A Clark
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.