Literature DB >> 3877735

Socioeconomic status and the prevalence of clinical gallbladder disease.

A K Diehl, M Rosenthal, H P Hazuda, P J Comeaux, M P Stern.   

Abstract

The prevalence of clinical gallbladder disease was determined in a cross-sectional survey of Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites. The study population was randomly selected from three urban neighborhoods representing different socioeconomic strata. Gallbladder disease was defined as a history of cholecystectomy, or of stones on cholecystography. Mexican American women had an age-standardized prevalence of 16.9%, vs 8.7% for non-Hispanic whites (p less than 0.0001). Prevalences in men were 4.2 and 3.4%, respectively. The ethnic differences in women persisted after stratification by age, parity, and body mass index. Gallbladder disease prevalence was inversely related to four measures of socioeconomic status. After controlling for age, obesity, parity, and ethnicity, the prevalence in women was inversely related to levels of education, income, occupational status, and neighborhood. These socioeconomic differences, if not the result of detection bias, suggest that environmental factors may play a role in gallstone pathogenesis. Identification of such factors may lead to the development of preventive strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3877735     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90100-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chronic Dis        ISSN: 0021-9681


  17 in total

Review 1.  Cholesterol gallstones: from epidemiology to prevention.

Authors:  M Acalovschi
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Prevalence of cholelithiasis among persons undergoing abdominal ultrasound at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.

Authors:  Adam Gyedu; Kwadwo Adae-Aboagye; Augustina Badu-Peprah
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Income, race, and surgery in Maryland.

Authors:  A M Gittelsohn; J Halpern; R L Sanchez
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The melting pot: examine before stirring.

Authors:  A K Diehl
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Risk factors for gallstone disease in Mexicans are similar to those found in Mexican-Americans.

Authors:  N Méndez-Sánchez; H Vega; M Uribe; L Guevara; M H Ramos; F Vargas-Vorackova
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Prevalence of gallstone disease in Mexico. A necropsy study.

Authors:  N Méndez-Sánchez; J Jessurun; G Ponciano-Rodríguez; P Alonso-de-Ruiz; M Uribe; M Hernández-Avila
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Gallstone characteristics in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites.

Authors:  A K Diehl; W H Schwesinger; D R Holleman; J B Chapman; W E Kurtin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Do patient or hospital demographics predict cholecystectomy outcomes? A nationwide study of 93,578 patients.

Authors:  A M Carbonell; A E Lincourt; K W Kercher; B D Matthews; W S Cobb; R F Sing; B T Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Epidemiology of gallstone disease in Argentina: prevalences in the general population and European descendants.

Authors:  A P Brasca; S M Pezzotto; D Berli; R Villavicencio; O Fay; M P Gianguzzo; L Poletto
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  A descriptive study of pregnant women with gallstones. Relation to dietary and social habits, education, physical activity, height, and weight.

Authors:  L Basso; P T McCollum; M R Darling; A Tocchi; W A Tanner
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.