Literature DB >> 3874643

Effect of speed of injection on induction of anaesthesia using propofol.

G Rolly, L Versichelen, L Huyghe, H Mungroop.   

Abstract

Sixty unpremedicated patients (30 male) were randomly allocated to three groups. They received an induction dose of propofol 2 mg kg-1 over 5, 20 or 60 s to a forearm vein. Anaesthesia was maintained with conventional inhalation anaesthetic agents. Anaesthesia was induced satisfactorily in all 20 of the patients in the 5-s group, in 19 of the patients in the 20-s group and in 18 of the patients in the 60-s group. The rate of injection had a significant influence on induction time. Mean induction time increased from 21.5 to 34.7 and 50.5 s, when injection time was increased from 5 to 20 to 60 s, respectively. Similar induction times were found in male and female patients. There was no significant difference between the groups, in depth of anaesthesia obtained--as assessed by the eyelash reflex. Mean arterial pressure decreased to the same extent in all three groups. Two minutes after induction, mean systolic arterial pressure was reduced by 15.1, 13.5 and 19.3 mm Hg in the 5-, 20- and 60-s groups, respectively, and mean diastolic arterial pressure by 10.3, 13.2 and 13.7 mm Hg. Heart rate changes were insignificant. Apnoea of more than 10 s duration was seen frequently in all three groups, but the results suggest that the incidence was not influenced by the rate of injection. Three patients experienced mild pain at the time of injection. No major adverse reactions occurred during or after anaesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3874643     DOI: 10.1093/bja/57.8.743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  15 in total

1.  Proceedings of the British Pharmacological Society, British Pharmacology Section. 18-20 April 1990, Sheffield. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Induction speed is not a determinant of propofol pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Anthony G Doufas; Maryam Bakhshandeh; Andrew R Bjorksten; Steven L Shafer; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Assessing interaction between dexmedetomidine and propofol.

Authors:  Gui-Zhen Yang; Fu-Shan Xue; Chao Sun
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  New iv induction anaesthetics.

Authors:  D H Morison
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Pharmacokinetics, induction of anaesthesia and safety characteristics of propofol 6% SAZN vs propofol 1% SAZN and Diprivan-10 after bolus injection.

Authors:  C A Knibbe; H J Voortman; L P Aarts; P F Kuks; R Lange; H J Langemeijer; M Danhof
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Propofol in patients with cardiac disease.

Authors:  N R Searle; P Sahab
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Pain reduction on injection of microemulsion propofol via combination of remifentanil and lidocaine.

Authors:  Yong Ku Han; Cheol Won Jeong; Hyung Gon Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-05-29

Review 8.  New intravenous anaesthetics and neuromuscular blocking drugs. A review of their properties and clinical use.

Authors:  C S Reilly; W S Nimmo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Propofol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and use as an intravenous anaesthetic.

Authors:  M S Langley; R C Heel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Pharmacokinetic implications for the clinical use of propofol.

Authors:  J Kanto; E Gepts
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.