Literature DB >> 387392

Meiotic nondisjunction in the mouse: methodology for genetic testing and comparison with other methods.

L B Russell.   

Abstract

Since trisomies produce adverse effects relatively late in development or even postnatally, they are an important component of the array of genetic damages that might be caused by environmental agents. Whole-chromosome aneuploidy (as opposed to breakage-derived aneuploidy) might come about secondarily from crossover depression, or could follow damage to the meiotic spindle or to kinetochores. For simplicity, the event-by whichever of the mechanisms-is referred to as meiotic nondisjunction (ND). A genetic method has been devised which is based on the facts that ND involving the sex chromosomes produces mostly viable mice, and that such exceptional animals can be externally recognized by the use of appropriate markers. The method is compared with the following other ND indicators: univalent and/or chiasma frequencies at M I; number of dyads at M II; extra sex chromosomes in spermatids; karyotypes in cleavage, morula, or blastocyst metaphases; and chromosome constitution of mid-gestation embryos. Some of the cytological endpoints are found to be unreliable. Various biological variables (germ-cell stage, sex, age) are examined with a view toward maximizing the chances for detecting induced nondisjunction. While experimental evidence on this question is equivocal, a consideration of the probable ND mechanisms suggests that the early spermatocyte (in stages including the premeiotic S phase) may be a favorable test object. The numerical sex-chromosome anomaly (NSA) method is useful not only in the study of ND but also in detecting breakage-derived chromosome losses induced in females, where the dominant lethal test is not easily applicable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 387392      PMCID: PMC1637639          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7931113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  36 in total

1.  Oogenesis in the mouse. A study of the meiotic prophase.

Authors:  K BORUM
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  Do XY- and O-sperm occur in Mus musculus?

Authors:  S OHNO; W D KAPLAN; R KINOSITA
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1959-10       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Comparative sensitivities of meiotic prophase stages in male mice to chromosome damage by acute X-and chronic gamma-irradiation.

Authors:  H C Walker
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Time of recombination in the Drosophila melanogaster oocyte: evidence from a temperature-sensitive recombination-deficient mutant.

Authors:  R F Grell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cytological investigation of embryos in low-dose X-irradiated young and old female inbred mice.

Authors:  C Max
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  The influence of phenol on chromosomes of mice (Mus musculus) in the process of spermatogenesis.

Authors:  H Bulsiewicz
Journal:  Folia Morphol (Warsz)       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.183

7.  Radiation-induced nondisjunction in oocytes of aged mice.

Authors:  I A Uchida; C P Freeman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The effects of ageing on the meiotic chromosomes of male and female mice.

Authors:  R M Speed
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1977-11-30       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Lack of effect on the chromosomal non-disjunction in aged female mice after low dose X-irradiation.

Authors:  R Strausmanis; I B Henrikson; M Holmberg; C Rönnbäck
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Origin of meiotic nondisjunction in Drosophila females.

Authors:  R F Grell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.