Literature DB >> 3873550

Early clinical signs identify low-risk patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

D R Bordley, A I Mushlin, J G Dolan, W S Richardson, M Barry, J Polio, P F Griner.   

Abstract

Early identification of patients at low risk for poor outcome after acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage would allow reduction of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. We identified six early predictors of good outcome: age less than 75 years, no unstable comorbid illness, no ascites found on physical examination, normal prothrombin time, and, within an hour after presentation, systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or greater and nasogastric aspirate free of fresh blood. Presence of all six predictors defined the low-risk population. Among 162 patients in the development and retrospective validation phases of our study, all 74 low-risk patients had good outcomes. A prospective validation study of 111 patients further established the accuracy of our predictive method; only two of 52 low-risk patients had poor outcomes. Application of our method should allow more selective management of patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3873550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  14 in total

1.  Validation of the Rockall scoring system for outcomes from non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Canadian setting.

Authors:  Robert-A Enns; Yves-M Gagnon; Alan-N Barkun; David Armstrong; Jamie-C Gregor; Richard-N Fedorak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Management of Diverticular Bleeding: Evaluation, Stabilization, Intervention, and Recurrence of Bleeding and Indications for Resection after Control of Bleeding.

Authors:  Mohammed Iyoob Mohammed Ilyas; Eric J Szilagy
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2018-06-22

3.  Characteristics of Short-stay Critical Care Admissions From Emergency Departments in Maryland.

Authors:  Obiora O Chidi; Sarah M Perman; Adit A Ginde
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Risk models for rebleeding and postoperative mortality in bleeding gastric ulcer.

Authors:  S Y Coleman; C J Pritchett; J Wong; F J Branicki
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  E M Vreeburg; C B Terwee; P Snel; E A Rauws; J F Bartelsman; J H Meulen; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Diagnostic strategies in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: patient and physician preferences.

Authors:  J G Dolan; D R Bordley; H Miller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Omeprazole versus placebo for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: randomised double blind controlled trial.

Authors:  T K Daneshmend; C J Hawkey; M J Langman; R F Logan; R G Long; R P Walt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-18

8.  Variation in use of intensive care for adults with diabetic ketoacidosis*.

Authors:  Hayley B Gershengorn; Theodore J Iwashyna; Colin R Cooke; Damon C Scales; Jeremy M Kahn; Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Using clinical data to predict abnormal serum electrolytes and blood cell profiles.

Authors:  W M Tierney; D K Martin; S L Hui; C J McDonald
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Development of a triage protocol for patients presenting with gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Aneesa M Das; Namita Sood; Katherine Hodgin; Lydia Chang; Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.