Literature DB >> 3871102

Functional distinctions between the LFA-1, LFA-2, and LFA-3 membrane proteins on human CTL are revealed with trypsin-pretreated target cells.

S H Gromkowski, A M Krensky, E Martz, S J Burakoff.   

Abstract

We asked whether we could distinguish the roles of the human lymphocyte membrane proteins LFA-1, LFA-2, and LFA-3 in the function of CTL-mediated killing. Little is known about the functions of these molecularly distinct proteins beyond the facts that i) binding of a monoclonal antibody (MAb) to any one of them is sufficient to inhibit killing, ii) that in each case inhibition involves prevention of CTL-target cell conjugate formation, and iii) that MAb to LFA-1 and LFA-2 inhibit best when bound to the CTL, whereas anti-LFA-3 inhibits only when bound to the target cell. This latter is despite the fact that (in our test system) LFA-1 and LFA-3 are expressed both on the CTL and on the target. When the target cells were pretreated with trypsin, the sensitivity of CTL-mediated killing was affected in a different way for each site. Inhibition of anti-LFA-1 was increased by approximately 20-fold. Inhibition by anti-LFA-2 was unaffected. Inhibition by anti-LFA-3 was abolished. Trypsin did not remove the specific antigens recognized by the various CTL, HLA-A,B,C or HLA-DR. Nor did it remove LFA-1 from the target cell. It did, however, selectively remove LFA-3 from the target cell. These results indicate, for the first time, that LFA-1 and LFA-2 have functionally distinct roles. They suggest that an unidentified trypsin-sensitive target cell molecule, operationally designated the "trypsin-sensitive counter blocker" (TSCB), plays an important role in the function of LFA-1, possibly by providing a target cell binding site for LFA-1 on the CTL. The hypothesis that this TSCB is identical to LFA-3 (and the related possibility that LFA-1 and LFA-3 are mutual ligands) is not favored by our data, but is not excluded. Finally, the data indicate that the mechanisms by which MAb inhibit killing differ at the LFA-1 and LFA-3 sites. They are consistent with LFA-1 providing adhesion strengthening by binding to another site (the TSCB?) and with LFA-3 delivering an inhibitory signal when provoked with MAb.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3871102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  4 in total

1.  Four antigens expressed on most ovine cell types.

Authors:  J F Maddox; C R Mackay; M R Brandon
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.397

2.  Accessory cell functions of dendritic cells and macrophages in the thymic T-cell response to Con A.

Authors:  Y Hirayama; K Inaba; S Komatsubara; K Yoshida; J Kawai; K Naito; S Muramatsu
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  Direct evidence for a receptor-ligand interaction between the T-cell surface antigen CD2 and lymphocyte-function-associated antigen 3.

Authors:  Y Takai; M L Reed; S J Burakoff; S H Herrmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Involvement of leukocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) in the invasion of hepatocyte cultures by lymphoma and T-cell hybridoma cells.

Authors:  E Roos; F F Roossien
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 10.539

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.