Literature DB >> 3870875

Significance of nucleotide sequence alignments: a method for random sequence permutation that preserves dinucleotide and codon usage.

S F Altschul1, B W Erickson.   

Abstract

The similarity of two nucleotide sequences is often expressed in terms of evolutionary distance, a measure of the amount of change needed to transform one sequence into the other. Given two sequences with a small distance between them, can their similarity be explained by their base composition alone? The nucleotide order of these sequences contributes to their similarity if the distance is much smaller than their average permutation distance, which is obtained by calculating the distances for many random permutations of these sequences. To determine whether their similarity can be explained by their dinucleotide and codon usage, random sequences must be chosen from the set of permuted sequences that preserve dinucleotide and codon usage. The problem of choosing random dinucleotide and codon-preserving permutations can be expressed in the language of graph theory as the problem of generating random Eulerian walks on a directed multigraph. An efficient algorithm for generating such walks is described. This algorithm can be used to choose random sequence permutations that preserve (1) dinucleotide usage, (2) dinucleotide and trinucleotide usage, or (3) dinucleotide and codon usage. For example, the similarity of two 60-nucleotide DNA segments from the human beta-1 interferon gene (nucleotides 196-255 and 499-558) is not just the result of their nonrandom dinucleotide and codon usage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3870875     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  64 in total

1.  Discovering common stem-loop motifs in unaligned RNA sequences.

Authors:  J Gorodkin; S L Stricklin; G D Stormo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Sequentially acting Sox transcription factors in neural lineage development.

Authors:  Maria Bergsland; Daniel Ramsköld; Cécile Zaouter; Susanne Klum; Rickard Sandberg; Jonas Muhr
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Abundance and diversity of biofilms in natural and artificial aquifers of the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory, Sweden.

Authors:  Sara Jägevall; Lisa Rabe; Karsten Pedersen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Rethinking Mass Spectrometry-Based Small Molecule Identification Strategies in Metabolomics.

Authors:  Fumio Matsuda
Journal:  Mass Spectrom (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-08-16

5.  Thousands of corresponding human and mouse genomic regions unalignable in primary sequence contain common RNA structure.

Authors:  Elfar Torarinsson; Milena Sawera; Jakob H Havgaard; Merete Fredholm; Jan Gorodkin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Structural RNA has lower folding energy than random RNA of the same dinucleotide frequency.

Authors:  Peter Clote; Fabrizio Ferré; Evangelos Kranakis; Danny Krizanc
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  Unique folding of precursor microRNAs: quantitative evidence and implications for de novo identification.

Authors:  Stanley Ng Kwang Loong; Santosh K Mishra
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.942

8.  Boltzmann ensemble features of RNA secondary structures: a comparative analysis of biological RNA sequences and random shuffles.

Authors:  Chi Yu Chan; Ye Ding
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Realistic artificial DNA sequences as negative controls for computational genomics.

Authors:  Juan Caballero; Arian F A Smit; Leroy Hood; Gustavo Glusman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  High-throughput binding analysis determines the binding specificity of ASF/SF2 on alternatively spliced human pre-mRNAs.

Authors:  Brian Chang; J Levin; William A Thompson; William G Fairbrother
Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.339

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.