Literature DB >> 3867637

The identification of human remains.

A Buchner.   

Abstract

In modern societies identification of human remains is necessary for both legal and social reasons. There are various methods, but all of them employ the basic process of comparison. Thus, identification is dependent upon the available ante-mortem records as well as the completeness and degree of preservation of the remains. The most frequently used and simplest method of identification is personal recognition by relatives and friends--a method that has led to innumerable mistakes. Evidence from clothing and personal belongings is also widely relied upon. It too leads to mistakes since loose objects can be mislaid or switched between bodies. The more reliable methods of identification rest upon features inherent in the body itself. Fingerprinting is the most accurate and precise method. If it cannot be used, the dental method becomes of the utmost importance. In cases of mutilated, decomposed, burned or fragmented bodies, other methods--medical, radiological, skeletal, serological and hair examinations--must be employed. Skeletal examination can lead to the reliable determination of age, sex, race and stature of the individual. From birth to adolescence, accurate age estimation can be obtained from tooth development and in adults by examination of the pubic symphysis. The data derived from these methods when pooled together provide sufficient comparison for conclusive identification to be established. The identification procedures in the Israel Defence Forces are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3867637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Dent J        ISSN: 0020-6539            Impact factor:   2.512


  9 in total

1.  Rugae patterns as an adjunct to sex differentiation in forensic identification.

Authors:  A Saraf; S Bedia; A Indurkar; S Degwekar; R Bhowate
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  Sex prediction from morphometric palatal rugae measures.

Authors:  Ma Saadeh; J G Ghafari; R V Haddad; F Ayoub
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2017-07-01

3.  Sex estimation using orbital measurements in the Croatian population.

Authors:  Elvira Krešić; Željana Bašić; Ivan Jerković; Ivana Kružić; Mislav Čavka; Igor Erjavec
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 2.456

4.  Correlation and estimation of stature from cephalofacial measurements: A study on Western Uttar Pradesh population.

Authors:  Munish Reddy; Vandana Reddy; Vijay Wadhwan; Arvind Venkatesh
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2018 May-Aug

5.  Palatal rugae patterns in orthodontically treated cases, are they a reliable forensic marker?

Authors:  V Deepak; Nikhil I Malgaonkar; Nishit Kumar Shah; Azzeghaiby Saleh Nasser; Kapil Dagrus; Tarakji Bassle
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-09

6.  Assessment of palatal rugae pattern for sex and ethnicity identification in an iranian population.

Authors:  Mahnaz Sheikhi; Mohammad Zandi; Maryam Ghazizadeh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

7.  Reliability of palatal rugae patterns in individual identification.

Authors:  T Smitha; Vina Vaswani; V Deepak; H S Sheethal; K N Hema; Vijay Kumar Jain
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2022-01-11

8.  A study of composite restorations as a tool in forensic identification.

Authors:  Bahavathi Ananthan Hemasathya; Sundaresan Balagopal
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2013-01

9.  Morphology of palatal rugae patterns among 5-15 years old children.

Authors:  Vilvanathan Prabu Rajan; John Baby John; Ariudinambi Stalin; Geetha Priya; Abdul Kareem Syed Abuthagir
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2013-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.