Literature DB >> 3867077

Biochemistry of DNA lesions.

J F Ward.   

Abstract

Ionizing radiation produces a range of damage types in cellular DNA. All damage types do not have the same biological significance. Here arguments are presented supporting the view that lesions in which damage is present on both strands in a local region of the DNA (locally multiply damaged sites--LMDS) will present problems for cellular repair processes. We have previously shown that lesions produced in DNA by individual OH radicals, i.e., single OH species acting alone, are ineffective in mammalian cell killing [J.F. Ward, W.F. Blakely, and E.I. Joner, Radiat. Res. 103, 383-392 (1985)]. We have similar evidence in mutagenesis studies (Ward and Calabro-Jones, unpublished data). Thus the formation of such damage by individual OH radicals formed by ionizing radiation would be similarly ineffectual. Earlier [J.F. Ward, Radiat. Res. 86, 185-195 (1981)] we suggested that OH-radical scavenging studies were consistent with the scavenging of OH radicals in volumes of high radical density, spurs, etc., i.e., in volumes which, when they overlap the DNA, will cause the production of LMDS. The individual constituent lesions of LMDS will be formed as a result of direct ionization or as a result of an OH-radical attack. Both mechanisms can lead to base damage or strand breakage. It is clear that damage in both bases of a deoxyribonucleotide pair leads to loss of base sequence information and can be repaired correctly only by accident or in a recombinational process.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3867077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res Suppl        ISSN: 0485-8611


  83 in total

1.  Clustered DNA damages induced in isolated DNA and in human cells by low doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  B M Sutherland; P V Bennett; O Sidorkina; J Laval
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Excision of 8-oxoguanine within clustered damage by the yeast OGG1 protein.

Authors:  M H David-Cordonnier; S Boiteux; P O'Neill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Biochemical aspects of radiation biology.

Authors:  U Hagen
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1989-01-15

Review 4.  How heterologously expressed Escherichia coli genes contribute to understanding DNA repair processes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jela Brozmanová; Viera Vlcková; Miroslav Chovanec
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 3.886

5.  Non-problematic risks from low-dose radiation-induced DNA damage clusters.

Authors:  Daniel P Hayes
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 7.  Health risks of space exploration: targeted and nontargeted oxidative injury by high-charge and high-energy particles.

Authors:  Min Li; Géraldine Gonon; Manuela Buonanno; Narongchai Autsavapromporn; Sonia M de Toledo; Debkumar Pain; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 8.401

8.  Neutron radiation can activate K-ras via a point mutation in codon 146 and induces a different spectrum of ras mutations than does gamma radiation.

Authors:  S R Sloan; E W Newcomb; A Pellicer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Evaluation of phosphodiesterase I-based protocols for the detection of multiply damaged sites in DNA: the detection of abasic, oxidative and alkylative tandem damage in DNA oligonucleotides.

Authors:  K J Bowman; R L Pla; Y Guichard; P B Farmer; G D Jones
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A recombinase paralog from the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus enhances SsoRadA ssDNA binding and strand displacement.

Authors:  William J Graham; Cynthia A Haseltine
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.688

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.