Literature DB >> 3864975

Polydimethyl siloxane materials in maxillofacial prosthetics: evaluation and comparison of physical properties.

W T Bell, V A Chalian, B K Moore.   

Abstract

The need for more acceptable materials for use in maxillofacial prosthetics has long been recognized. In this study, the physical properties of several currently available polydimethyl siloxane materials were evaluated and compared with those of two previously tested materials. The properties chosen were tensile strength, elongation, tear strength, and hardness. These properties were chosen as indicators of the strength, flexibility, durability, and lifelike feel of the materials in clinical service. Testing procedures were intended to duplicate as nearly as possible those used by Chalian and Jones and to conform closely to ASTM specifications. In general, the physical properties of the five silicone materials tested in this study were superior to those of MDX-4-4210 and MDX-4-4514, tested previously. This superiority was particularly evident in terms of strength and elongation. Although the materials failed to demonstrate the softness of other materials, they may prove acceptable with the addition of available modifiers. Although no material was consistently superior to the others, potential merit is seen especially in Q7-4635 and SE-4524U. These materials exhibited high strength and softness and are available in one component system. Unlike the two-component addition chemistry systems, these materials have an indefinite pot life and are much more easily manipulated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3864975     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90561-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  2 in total

1.  Histopathologic study of rat connective tissue responses to maxillofacial silicone elastomers.

Authors:  Bilge Turhan Bal; Handan Yilmaz; Cemal Aydin; Seçil Karakoca; Benay Tokman
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Author's response: Prosthetic rehabilitation after orbital exenteration: a case series.

Authors:  Gunjan Pruthi; Veena Jain; Suresh Rajendiran; Ritu Jha
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.848

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.