Literature DB >> 3861861

The new antifluoridationists: who are they and how do they operate?

M W Easley.   

Abstract

Since Grand Rapids became the first community to adjust the fluoride content of its water supply, individuals and groups have objected to water fluoridation. Early opponents of fluoridation were often members of fringe groups or were associated with the health food movement, were chiropractors, or were Christian Scientists. Once these individuals and groups began exchanging ideas and experiences, national groups were formed for the sole purpose of fighting fluoridation. While most of these organizations lacked sufficient funding or expertise to have much impact outside of the communities where they were based, some national multi-issue organizations appeared that were well funded and that focused on antifluoridation as one of their goals. Through exploitation of society's current phobias about health and disease, these national groups have become increasingly successful in negatively influencing the public about the effectiveness, safety, and economy of community water fluoridation. Their tactics range from community actions aimed at local governmental bodies, to well-organized local referenda, to litigation in state and federal courts, to lobbying state legislatures and the US Congress. Specific legal, community organizational, and political tactics employed by the antifluoride groups are reviewed and classified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3861861     DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1985.tb01127.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Dent        ISSN: 0022-4006            Impact factor:   1.821


  6 in total

1.  The status of community water fluoridation in the United States.

Authors:  M W Easley
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  The fluoridation status of U.S. public water supplies.

Authors:  H Löe
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Fluoridation referendum in La Crosse, Wisconsin: contributing factors to success.

Authors:  R B Jones; D N Mormann; T B Durtsche
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Fluoridation: why is it not more widely adopted?

Authors:  R J Musto
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1987-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  What Maryland adults with young children know and do about preventing dental caries.

Authors:  Alice M Horowitz; Dushanka V Kleinman; Min Qi Wang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  When public action undermines public health: a critical examination of antifluoridationist literature.

Authors:  Jason M Armfield
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2007-12-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.