Literature DB >> 3860257

A cephalometric comparison between Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion in adults.

H Fischer-Brandies, E Fischer-Brandies, A König.   

Abstract

The lateral cephalometric radiographs of 56 adults with Angle Class II/2 malocclusion and of 81 persons with normal Class I occlusion are compared. The statistical analysis includes the calculation of the mean value, standard deviation and the determination of differences (Wilcoxon rank-test). Group characteristics are tested by stepwise discriminant analysis. The following statements regarding Angle Class II/2 as compared with normal Class I result from this study. The upper incisors are in a retruded position. The B-point is significantly retropositioned, whereas the pogonion is in a more normal position. The length of the mandibular corpus and the total length of the mandible are slightly diminished only. Normal values result for the size and position of the maxilla, the inclination of the mandibular corpus (angle between mandibular plane and NSe) and the gonion angle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3860257     DOI: 10.1179/bjo.12.3.158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Orthod        ISSN: 0301-228X


  4 in total

1.  Extraction therapy in patients with Class II/2 malocclusion.

Authors:  A Stellzig; E K Basdra; C Kube; G Komposch
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Dentoskeletal morphology in children with Deckbiss.

Authors:  H Pancherz; K Zieber
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Association of dentoskeletal morphology with incisor inclination in angle class II patients: a retrospective cephalometric study.

Authors:  Christian Kirschneck; Piero Römer; Peter Proff; Carsten Lippold
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Tooth Position in Wind Instrument Players: Dentofacial Cephalometric Analysis.

Authors:  Miguel Pais Clemente; André Moreira; Catarina Morais; José Manuel Amarante; Afonso Pinhão Ferreira; Joaquim Mendes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.