Literature DB >> 3857860

Biomechanical design and clinical evaluation of a new canine-retraction spring.

P Gjessing.   

Abstract

Use of the sectional arch technique facilitates the creation of an optimal force system fulfilling the biomechanical requirements imperative for planned tooth movements. Controlled canine retraction, usually in extraction cases, requires the creation of a biomechanical system to deliver a predetermined force and a relatively constant moment-to-force ratio in order to avoid distal tipping and rotation. The responsive couple delivered to the anchorage unit should be adjusted in such a way that no single tooth is subjected to unwanted side effects and that undesirable changes in the occlusal plane are avoided. On the basis of a series of theoretical considerations described in the present report, a canine-retraction spring was constructed from 0.016 X 0.022 inch stainless steel wire, the principal element being a double ovoid loop 10 mm in height. A "sweep" bend was incorporated to avoid unwanted side effects at the second premolar. Load deflection and moment/force curves were derived experimentally and demonstrate the ability of the spring to generate and maintain biomechanical conditions necessary for optimal canine retraction (that is, load deflection = 45 gm per millimeter of activation, antitip moment/force ratio of approximately 11:1, and antirotation moment/force ratio of approximately 7:1). The clinical applicability of the spring is demonstrated in the present report by the presentation of two treated cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3857860     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90195-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  12 in total

1.  [Space closure with T loops (Burstone)--a clinical study].

Authors:  W Bauer; P Diedrich; H Wehrbein; B Schneider
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1992-08

2.  Understanding the basis of space closure in Orthodontics for a more efficient orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Gerson Luiz Ulema Ribeiro; Helder B Jacob
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

3.  Evaluation of Effects and Effectiveness of Various α and β Angulations for Three Different Loop Made of Stainless Steel Arch Wires - A FEM Study.

Authors:  Supradeep Kumar Kamisetty; Raghuveer N; Rajavikram N; Chakrapani N
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

4.  PG Canine Retraction Spring.

Authors:  Jaideep Sengupta; S K Sharma; Dhirendra Sahu
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

5.  Efficacy of Second Molar to Achieve Anchorage Control in Maximum Anchorage Cases.

Authors:  S M Londhe; P Kumar; R Mitra; A Kotwal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

6.  [Retraction of the upper incisors with pseudoelastic treatment elements. Their computational and biomechanical testing and clinical use].

Authors:  C Bourauel; D Drescher
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1994-02

7.  Effect of light-emitting photobiomodulation therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement : A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Yaman Güray; A Sema Yüksel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 2.341

8.  [Arch-guided tooth movement--its dynamics, efficacy and side effects].

Authors:  H A Schumacher; C Bourauel; D Drescher
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1991-06

9.  Are there differences on tooth movement between different sectional canine retractors?

Authors:  B Işik Aslan; B Baloştuncer; M Dinçer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Evaluating the Amount of Tooth Movement and Root Resorption during Canine Retraction with Friction versus Frictionless Mechanics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Mohamed Makhlouf; Amr Aboul-Ezz; Mona Salah Fayed; Hend Hafez
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.