Literature DB >> 3855424

Alternative interpretations of water sorption values of composite resins.

P L Fan, A Edahl, R L Leung, J W Stanford.   

Abstract

Water sorption values for direct filling resins and an unfilled resin were much more similar at 30 days when expressed as mg/g organic matrix than as mg/cm2 or weight percent. This interpretation is indicative of the water sorption characteristics of resin matrices. The values are even more indicative when solubility or leaching is taken into consideration. With the specimen sizes used in this study, the effect of the kinetics of water sorption could be minimized by using values obtained after immersion in water for 30 days.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1985        PMID： 3855424     DOI： 10.1177/00220345850640011601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN： 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  9 in total

1.  Alternative monomer for BisGMA-free resin composites formulations.

Authors:  Ana P Fugolin; Andreia B de Paula; Adam Dobson; Vincent Huynh; Rafael Consani; Jack L Ferracane; Carmem S Pfeifer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  BisGMA/TEGDMA dental nanocomposites containing glyoxylic acid-modified high-aspect ratio hydroxyapatite nanofibers with enhanced dispersion.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Changqi Xu; Yong Wang; Jian Shi; Qingsong Yu; Hao Li
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.715

3.  The effect of functionalized titanium dioxide nanotube reinforcement on the water sorption and water solubility properties of flowable bulk-fill composite resins.

Authors:  Mustafa Kutay Karaca; Ozge Kam Hepdeniz; Banu Esencan Turkaslan; Osman Gurdal
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Evaluation of weight change in three different light cured composite restorative materials stored in water: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Mithra N Hegde; Basawaraj Biradar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2008-07

5.  Bone cements and fillers: a review.

Authors:  S M Kenny; M Buggy
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Impact of similarity in chemical composition of light-polymerized resin composites on post-gel strains and interface integrity.

Authors:  Murat Cavit Cehreli; Zafer Cavit Cehreli; Kivanc Akca
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 4.727

7.  Evaluation of the effect of water on three different light cured composite restorative materials stored in water: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Basawaraj Biradar; Sudharani Biradar; Arvind Ms
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-01-22

8.  Temperature and curing time affect composite sorption and solubility.

Authors:  Fabrício Luscino Alves de Castro; Bruno Barbosa Campos; Kely Firmino Bruno; Rogério Vieira Reges
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Solubility of two resin composites in different mouthrinses.

Authors:  Sezin Ozer; Emine Sen Tunc; Nuray Tuloglu; Sule Bayrak
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.411
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.