Literature DB >> 3855348

Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: a cephalometric appraisal of first-premolar-extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics.

T E Shields, R M Little, M K Chapko.   

Abstract

Assessment at least 10 years postretention of fifty-four cases previously treated in the permanent-dentition stage with first-premolar extractions, traditional edgewise mechanotherapy, and retention revealed considerable variation among patients. The long-term response to mandibular anterior alignment was unpredictable; no cephalometric parameters, such as maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination, horizontal and vertical growth amounts, mandibular plane angle, etc., were useful in establishing a prognosis. Few associations of value were found between cephalometric parameters and dental-cast measurements, such as overbite, arch length, intercanine width, and overjet. Only a slight tendency was found for incisor inclination to return toward the pretreatment value during the postretention period. It was possible to predict, on the basis of an analysis of pre- and posttreatment cephalometric records, those cases which had greater than 4 mm deepening of overbite postretention as well as those cases which had decreases of 3 mm or more in arch-length postretention. The practical use of these predictions were of limited clinical value, however.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3855348     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90171-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  4 in total

1.  The concept of bimaxillary transverse osteodistraction: a paradigm shift?

Authors:  M Y Mommaerts; N Ali; P Correia
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-05-11

2.  Orthodontics.

Authors:  B Hemrend; G Altuna; B Tompson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  The role of extraction in stability of orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  B Kahl-Nieke
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  A retrospective randomized double-blind comparison study of the effectiveness of Hawley vs vacuum-formed retainers.

Authors:  Stephen Barlin; Roland Smith; Ray Reed; Jonathan Sandy; Anthony John Ireland
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.