Literature DB >> 385119

Bacterial filters - are they necessary on anaesthetic machines?

F C Ping, J L Oulton, J A Smith, A G Skidmore, L C Jenkins.   

Abstract

At the Vancouver General Hospital the effectiveness of the system for decontamination of anaesthetic equipment was evaluated to determine the need for bacterial filters on anaesthetic machines. Two groups of patients were studied. Group I consisted of 33 patients, none of whom had clinical symptoms of respiratory tract disease. Group II consisted of 17 patients who had lower respiratory tract secretions. In the latter group 16 had chronic bronchitis and had cystic fibrosis. Of 550 bacterial cultures taken from the anaesthetic equipment immediately before and after anaesthesia in our 50 patients, only five yielded a growth of non-pathogenic bacteria. The results of this study indicate that bacterial colonization of anaesthetic equipment is of a low order and is adequately controlled by pasteurization even after use in patients with chronic lower respiratory tract disease. The use of bacterial filters does not appear justified if a strict regimen of cleaning and pasteurization is followed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 385119     DOI: 10.1007/bf03006457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J        ISSN: 0008-2856


  16 in total

1.  STERILISATION OF ANAESTHETIC EQUIPMENT.

Authors:  J R JENKINS; W M EDGAR
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1964-04       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Anesthetic equipment as a source of infection.

Authors:  J JACOBY; C ZIEGLER
Journal:  Curr Res Anesth Analg       Date:  1956 Sep-Oct

3.  Decontamination of anesthesia apparatus.

Authors:  G L GROSS
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1955-11       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Disease transmission by inefficiently sanitized anesthetizing apparatus.

Authors:  J M JOSEPH
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1952-07-26

5.  The anesthesia machine and circle system are not likely to be sources of bacterial contamination.

Authors:  G C du Moulin; A J Saubermann
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa cross-infection due to contaminated respiratory apparatus.

Authors:  I Phillips; G Spencer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1965-12-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic traced to delivery-room resuscitators.

Authors:  J Fierer; P M Taylor; H M Gezon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1967-05-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Cross-infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a hazard of intensive surgery.

Authors:  J E Tinne; A M Gordon; W H Bain; W A Mackey
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1967-11-11

9.  Gram-negative pneumonitis: a new postoperative menace.

Authors:  M Atik; B Hanson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  Questionnaire study of anesthesia equipment sterility.

Authors:  G Dryden
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1968-12-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Is bacterial contamination of anaesthetic equipment adequately controlled by pasteurization alone?

Authors:  H Nielsen; J B Jacobsen; C Ringsted
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1980-05

2.  Portable lung ventilators: the potential risk from bacterial colonisation.

Authors:  M P Shelly; G R Park; R E Warren; R J Whetstone
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Infectious diseases and the anaesthetist.

Authors:  R A Browne; M A Chernesky
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.063

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.