Literature DB >> 3837669

Muscular and intraocular pressure responses among ocular-hypertensive subjects: is there a rationale for biofeedback?

J M Raczynski, D A Mason, R P Wilson, E S Silvia, R N Kleinstein.   

Abstract

Several animal and human investigations have indicated that intraocular pressure (IOP) levels may be associated with extreme drug-induced changes in the extraocular muscles. Further, recent data suggest that, among individuals with normal IOP level, moderate increases in facial muscle (EMG) activity around the eye while the eye is open are associated with increases in IOP. To investigate further the relationship between facial EMG activity and IOP levels and to examine a group of individuals with elevated IOP levels, subjects were recruited from outpatients at an optometry clinic. Three groups of subjects were selected: a group of ocular hypertensive subjects who showed elevated pressures at the optometry clinic and upon the day of testing, a group of labile ocular hypertensive subjects who evinced elevated pressures during their visit to the optometry clinic but lower pressures on the day of testing, and a group of normal IOP subjects who showed normal pressures both during their optometry clinic visit and on the day of testing. To investigate anxiety differences, subjects were administered the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, but subsequent analysis revealed no group differences. To evaluate the role of stress upon muscle (EMG) functioning around the eye, subjects were subjected to imagery and standardized mental arithmetic stressors; analyses of these results also revealed no significant group differences. Finally, subjects were given EMG biofeedback for muscle activity around the eye while IOP was assessed during five alternating periods in which they made decreases and increases in EMG activity. Results revealed significant group, period, and group by period interaction effects. The pattern of results is interpreted as implicating EMG activity in IOP fluctuations; the implications of these data for potential biofeedback and stress management treatments are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3837669     DOI: 10.1007/bf00999258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN: 0363-3586


  9 in total

1.  The effect of succinylcholine on the extraocular muscles.

Authors:  H A LINCOFF; G M BREININ; A G DE VOE
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1957-03       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  The effect of succinylcholine on intraocular pressure.

Authors:  H A LINCOFF; C H ELLIS; A G DEVOE; E J DEBEER; D J IMPASTATO; S BERG; L ORKIN; H MAGDA
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1955-10       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Studies on the intra-ocular pressure: Part I. The action of drugs on the vascular and muscular factors controlling the intra-ocular pressure.

Authors:  J Colle; P M Duke-Elder; W S Duke-Elder
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1931-01-21       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Pressure of the lid on the eye.

Authors:  D Miller
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1967-09

5.  Inhibition of succinylcholine-induced increased intraocular pressure by non-depolarizing muscle relaxants.

Authors:  R D Miller; W L Way; R F Hickey
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1968 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Self-regulated facial muscle tension effects on intraocular pressure.

Authors:  E S Silvia; J M Raczynski; R N Kleinstein
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 7.  Biofeedback techniques in the treatment of visual and ophthalmologic disorders: a review of the literature.

Authors:  M H Rotberg; R S Surwit
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1981-09

8.  Contraction of the oculorotary muscles and intraocular pressure. A tonographic and electromyographic study of the effect of edrophonium chloride (tensilon) and succinylcholine (anectine) on the intraocular pressure.

Authors:  W KORNBLUETH; A JAMPOLSKY; E TAMLER; E MARG
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1960-06       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Primate myopia.

Authors:  F A Young
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1981-07
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  What do glaucoma specialists know about their patients?

Authors:  Thomas S Dietlein; Jens Jordan; Sven Dinslage; Günter K Krieglstein
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Dual effect of the Valsalva maneuver on autonomic nervous system activity, intraocular pressure, Schlemm's canal, and iridocorneal angle morphology.

Authors:  Li Sun; Wei Chen; Zhiqi Chen; Yan Xiang; Jingmin Guo; Tian Hu; Qiongfang Xu; Hong Zhang; Junming Wang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  Intraocular pressure fluctuation during resistance exercise.

Authors:  Ehsan Vaghefi; Catherine Shon; Stacey Reading; Taylor Sutherland; Victor Borges; Geraint Phillips; Rachael L Niederer; Helen Danesh-Meyer
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.