Literature DB >> 3837094

Visual scanning behaviour in honeybees.

M Lehrer, R Wehner, M Srinivasan.   

Abstract

Freely flying bees were rewarded with sugar solution on a variety of black-and-white shapes as well as on coloured gratings in various training situations. In subsequent dual-choice tests, the bees' discrimination between the various shapes was measured. In addition, the bees were video-filmed while flying in front of the shapes. The scanning patterns thus obtained were then quantified in order to characterize scanning behaviour and its relationship to the geometrical parameters of the scanned shapes, investigate whether scanning plays a role in pattern discrimination and examine the influence of training on the characteristics of scanning. The scanning patterns clearly mirror the contours of the scanned shape in all cases, i.e. the bees fly along the contours contained in the shape. This behaviour does not depend on whether the scanned shape is one that was previously rewarded, or one that is completely novel to the bees. Comparison of the results of quantifying the scanning patterns with the results of dual-choice tests reveals that scanning behaviour is independent of discrimination performance. On the average, horizontal scanning directions occur more often than vertical directions. Variations of the training situation produce measurable differences in scanning behavior. However, except in the case of vertical scanning on a vertical grating, these differences are quite small, indicating that following contours is a largely stereotyped behaviour. Horizontal gratings are very well discriminated from vertical ones even if they offer contrast to only one receptor type, i.e. blue or green, demonstrating that the direction of contours is visible to the pattern recognition system even under these conditions. However, vertical and horizontal coloured gratings offering only blue-contrast do not elicit contour-following, whereas gratings offering only green-contrast do. Thus, the bees' scanning behaviour is colour-blind and most probably governed by the green receptors. We suggest that contour-following is the by-product of a behavioural mode which serves to prevent retinal image movement during flight in front of a contoured visual pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3837094     DOI: 10.1007/bf00615140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  1 in total

1.  Scanpaths in eye movements during pattern perception.

Authors:  D Noton; L Stark
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-01-22       Impact factor: 47.728

  1 in total
  8 in total

1.  Shape discrimination by wasps (Paravespula germanica) at the food source: generalization among various types of contrast.

Authors:  Miriam Lehrer; Raymond Campan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Difference in dynamic properties of photoreceptors in a butterfly, Papilio xuthus: possible segregation of motion and color processing.

Authors:  Masashi Kawasaki; Michiyo Kinoshita; Matti Weckström; Kentaro Arikawa
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Chromatic signals control proboscis movements during hovering flight in the hummingbird hawkmoth Macroglossum stellatarum.

Authors:  Joaquín Goyret; Almut Kelber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The behavioral relevance of landmark texture for honeybee homing.

Authors:  Laura Dittmar; Martin Egelhaaf; Wolfgang Stürzl; Norbert Boeddeker
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Prototypical components of honeybee homing flight behavior depend on the visual appearance of objects surrounding the goal.

Authors:  Elke Braun; Laura Dittmar; Norbert Boeddeker; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Infection behavior of a parasitoid fly, Emblemasoma auditrix, and its host cicada Okanagana rimosa.

Authors:  Kerstin Schniederkötter; Reinhard Lakes-Harlan
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 1.857

7.  Functional Significance of Labellum Pattern Variation in a Sexually Deceptive Orchid (Ophrys heldreichii): Evidence of Individual Signature Learning Effects.

Authors:  Kerstin Stejskal; Martin Streinzer; Adrian Dyer; Hannes F Paulus; Johannes Spaethe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Approach Direction Prior to Landing Explains Patterns of Colour Learning in Bees.

Authors:  Keri V Langridge; Claudia Wilke; Olena Riabinina; Misha Vorobyev; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.