Literature DB >> 3834386

Poggendorff and Müller-Lyer illusions: common effects.

S Greist-Bousquet, H R Schiffman.   

Abstract

Previous investigations have shown that the magnitude of the Müller-Lyer illusion is a function of the linear and angular dimensions of the figure. If the Müller-Lyer and Poggendorff illusions share a common basis, then the magnitude of the Poggendorff illusion should similarly be a function of the analogous configural dimensions. A study is reported in which changes were made in the dimensions of the Poggendorff figure that are analogous to the dimensions of the Müller-Lyer figure: the length of the parallel components (analogous to the wings of the Müller-Lyer figure); the length of the intertransversal extent (analogous to Müller-Lyer shaft length); and the angle formed between the parallel components and the intertransversal extent (analogous to the angle of wing attachment in the Müller-Lyer figure). The relationship between the magnitude of the illusion and the dimensions of the Poggendorff figure was found to be generally in line with previous findings relating to the Müller-Lyer illusion. Adaptation-level theory and the positive-context model accommodate the major findings of the present study.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3834386     DOI: 10.1068/p140427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  12 in total

1.  The orientation of a parallel-line texture between the verticals can modify the strength of the Poggendorff illusion.

Authors:  R Masini; R Sciaky; A Pascarella
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-09

2.  Illusion decrement and transfer of illusion decrement in obtuse- and acute-angle variants of the Poggendorff illusion.

Authors:  J Predebon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-11

3.  How far can attraction-caused misalignment account for the Morinaga misalignment effect?

Authors:  W H Hotopf; S Brown
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990

4.  Examination of apparent extent as an explanation of the Poggendorff effect.

Authors:  M T Trueman; A E Wilson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-06

5.  The basis of the Poggendorff effect: an additional clue for Day and Kasperczyk.

Authors:  S Greist-Bousquet; H R Schiffman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-06

6.  A note on enhancing the Poggendorff illusion.

Authors:  S Greist-Bousquet; H R Schiffman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

7.  No evidence for apparent extent between parallels as the basis of the Poggendorff effect.

Authors:  R H Day; W J Jolly; F M Duffy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-12

8.  Matching gaps between misaligned pointers demonstrates that lines, both transverse and parallel, enhance Poggendorff illusions.

Authors:  P Wenderoth; T O'Connor
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-02

9.  The relation between apparent extent and alignment in the Poggendorff illusion: a response to "No Evidence for Apparent Extent Between parallels as the Basis of the Poggendorff Effect," by Day, Jolly, and Duffy.

Authors:  S Greist-Bousquet; H R Schiffman; R Dorsett; J Davis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

10.  The logic of misperceived distance (or location) theories of the Poggendorff illusion.

Authors:  D J Weintraub
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.