Literature DB >> 383059

[Clinical observations in electric stimulation of the ear (author's transl)].

K Burian.   

Abstract

For 20 years direct electrical stimulation has been used in cases of severe bilateral hearing loss or complete deafness to mediate acoustic percepts. The relevant literature is reviewed. While these attempts were initially thought to be unphysiological and unsuited for transferring speech, acoustic sensations were successfully conveyed even with the very simple unichannel electrodes through percutaneous signal transfer. Patients fitted with such simple systems were able to hear and distinguish environmental noise and speech, their lip reading as well as their speech improved. Speech discrimination was, however, impossible with such simple implants both on theoretical grounds and in practical terms, because frequency analysis is exclusively based on periodicity (up to 400 Hz). Designing bipolar multichannel electrodes which, when introduced into the scala tympani or the modiolus, produce discrete stimulation of several circumscribed groups of nerve fibers, was the logical consequence of earlier attempts along these lines, Implantation of these systems can be done along the transmeatal, meato-mastoidal or mastoidal approach. The electrodes can be implanted in bundles through the round window or into the modiolus; they can, however, also be introduced individually through several drill holes in the promontory for placement in the scala tympani and vestibuli. This produces a far more differentiated stimulation simulating a tonotopic pattern of stimuli. In addition to periodicity, the place principle can thus be utilized for frequency coding. While their dynamic range is rather poor (15 to 30 dB at best), multichannel systems, in theory, offer substantially more favorable conditions for speech intelligibility. Since current knowledge of speech coding is, however, inadequate, the degree of intelligibility obtainable is still insufficient for everyday life. Inspite of this flaw, such implants as are available today substantially benefit the patients, who are able to establish acoustic communications with their environment by distinguishing environmental noise from speech, to discriminate between male and female voices, to recognize musical rhythms and even to understand a few words. Indications for the implantation of prostheses, the requisite conditions and postoperative training programs are discussed. While cochlear implants are still experimental, they appear to be reasonably justified in selected cases, since they have been well tolerated by all patients treated sofar without causing any complications and since many of the data obtainable can only be collected in humans. It is, however, essential that experimental implantation be exclusively dealt with by specialized teams, which should evaluate such data as are available and translate them into practice as soon as possible. A routine impantation of hearing prostheses is currently unwarranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 383059     DOI: 10.1007/bf00455078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0302-9530


  30 in total

1.  Artifical hearing for the deaf by cochlear stimulation: pitch modulation and some parametric thresholds.

Authors:  M G Mladejovsky; D K Eddington; W H Dobelle; D E Brackmann
Journal:  Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs       Date:  1975

2.  A cochlear implant electrode.

Authors:  G M Clark; R J Hallworth; K Zdanius
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 1.469

3.  ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF EIGHT CRANIAL NERVE.

Authors:  J H DOYLE; J B DOYLE; F M TURNBULL
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1964-10

4.  [Auditory prosthesis by means of a distant electrical stimulation of the sensory nerve with the use of an indwelt coiling].

Authors:  A DJOURNO; C EYRIES
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1957-08-31       Impact factor: 1.228

5.  Experimental investigation into the problem of humoral transmission in the cochlea.

Authors:  L GISSELSSON
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1950

6.  A new approach to the cochlear implant.

Authors:  E Douek
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1977-06

7.  A cochlear prosthesis: further clinical observations; preliminary results of physiological studies.

Authors:  R P Michelson; M M Merzenich; C R Pettit; R A Schindler
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Chronic intracochlear electrode implantation: cochlear pathology and acoustic nerve survival.

Authors:  R A Schindler; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1974 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Placement of electrodes for excitation of the eighth nerve.

Authors:  R A Walloch; D A Cowden
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1974-07

10.  Research plan for evaluating subjects presently fitted with implanted auditory prostheses.

Authors:  R C Bilger; F O Black; N T Hopkinson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1977 May-Jun
View more
  2 in total

1.  [Present state of cochlear implant treatment in adults and children].

Authors:  J Maurer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  The cochlear implant: historical aspects and future prospects.

Authors:  Adrien A Eshraghi; Ronen Nazarian; Fred F Telischi; Suhrud M Rajguru; Eric Truy; Chhavi Gupta
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.064

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.