Literature DB >> 3829742

Comparative clinical experience with porcine bioprosthetic and St. Jude valve replacement.

L S Czer, J M Matloff, A Chaux, M A DeRobertis, R J Gray.   

Abstract

From 1976 to 1984, 656 patients underwent aortic, mitral, or double valve replacement with a Hancock or Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis (POR; n = 293) or with a St. Jude bileaflet valve (SJ; n = 363). Recipients of the St. Jude valve were of more advanced NYHA class preoperatively, required smaller prosthetic sizes, and more often had associated coronary artery disease necessitating bypass grafting (p less than .05). Despite these differences, POR and SJ recipients demonstrated similar 30-day mortality (7.5 vs 10.2 percent), five-year freedom from embolism (92 +/- 2 percent vs 92 +/- 2 percent), freedom from all valve-related complications (79 +/- 3 percent vs 79 +/- 4 percent), and survival (72 +/- 3 percent vs 71 +/- 3 percent) (p = NS). Structural failures occurred exclusively in POR recipients (3.0-4.5 percent/pt-yr after four years), and endocarditis was more common (1.0 vs 0.5 percent/pt-yr); as a result, the reoperation rate was three times higher in POR than SJ recipients (1.4 vs 0.46 percent/pt-yr, p less than .05). Warfarin-related bleeding (2.5 percent/pt-yr) was the most common complication in SJ recipients, but occurred equally frequently in POR recipients requiring anticoagulation; seven (44 percent) of 16 valve-related late deaths were warfarin-related. In properly anticoagulated patients, the thromboembolic rate was low (2.0 percent and 1.1 percent/pt-yr, POR and SJ); this rate increased significantly in SJ recipients receiving antiplatelet drugs alone (4.2 percent/pt-yr; n = 16) or no anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy (26.4 percent/pt-yr; n = 18) (p less than .05), but increased only slightly in POR recipients (to 1.5 percent/pt-yr, n = 108, and 2.0 percent/pt-yr, n = 63, respectively). Postoperatively, NYHA class 1 was more often achieved in SJ than POR recipients (60 vs 39 percent, p less than .05), perhaps because of the better hemodynamic performance of the SJ valve. Thus, despite differences in patient selection and the nature of complications observed with each prosthetic type, porcine and St. Jude valves provide similar early and late survival, frequency of embolism, total complication rate, and freedom from valve-related morbidity and mortality after five years of follow-up. Limited durability, susceptibility to infection, and inferior hemodynamics remain drawbacks to use of the porcine bioprosthesis. The necessity for warfarin anticoagulation and the frequency of resultant bleeding complications are the major shortcomings of the St. Jude valve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3829742     DOI: 10.1378/chest.91.4.503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  4 in total

1.  Mid-term surgical results after valve replacement with the CarboMedics valve prosthesis.

Authors:  T Abe; K Morishita; M Tsukamoto; T Tanaka; S Komatsu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Aortic valve replacement: is porcine or bovine valve better?

Authors:  Kok Hooi Yap; Ralph Murphy; Mohan Devbhandari; Rajamiyer Venkateswaran
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-12-04

Review 3.  Anticoagulation for mechanical heart valves: a role for patient based therapy.

Authors:  Robert W Emery; Ann M Emery; Goya V Raikar; Jay G Shake
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Update on mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tsuneyoshi; Masashi Komeda
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.385

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.