Literature DB >> 3829740

Prediction of successful ventilator weaning using airway occlusion pressure and hypercapnic challenge.

A B Montgomery, R H Holle, S R Neagley, D J Pierson, R B Schoene.   

Abstract

We studied eleven patients during 14 attempts at weaning from mechanical ventilation to determine whether central ventilatory drive, measured as airway occlusion pressure 0.1 s after onset of inspiration (P 0.1), during spontaneous breathing before and during a brief hypercapnic challenge, could accurately predict the success or failure of the attempt. All patients were recovering from acute respiratory failure and could breathe spontaneously for 20 minutes on a T-piece but were judged clinically to be marginal weaning candidates. Minute ventilation (VI) and P 0.1 were measured while breathing spontaneously and were repeated during a hypercapnic challenge that raised end-tidal PCO2 approximately 10 mm Hg. Seven of the 14 weaning attempts were unsuccessful, requiring reinstitution of mechanical ventilation. Although the failure group had lower mean maximum inspiratory force and higher spontaneous respiratory rate, no threshold value separated the failure from the success group. Ventilation increased more during hypercapnic challenge in those patients whose weaning attempt was successful, but overlap of results between the two groups rendered this test inaccurate for predicting weaning success. In contrast, successfully weaned patients had greater augmentation of P 0.1 during hypercapnia, expressed as the ratio of P 0.1 during CO2-stimulated to P 0.1 during baseline values, than did those who failed weaning (p less than 0.005). This ratio succeeded, and was thus both specific and sensitive as a predictor of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3829740     DOI: 10.1378/chest.91.4.496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  18 in total

Review 1.  The pulmonary physician in critical care. 10: difficult weaning.

Authors:  J Goldstone
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Airway occlusion pressure (P0.1)-a useful predictor for the weaning outcome in patients with acute respiratory failure-.

Authors:  K Okamoto; T Sato; T Morioka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Remembrance of weaning past: the seminal papers.

Authors:  Martin J Tobin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  P 0.1/PIMax: an index for assessing respiratory capacity in acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  R Fernández; J Cabrera; N Calaf; S Benito
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Maximum relaxation rate of the diaphragm during weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  J C Goldstone; M Green; J Moxham
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Diaphragm electromyographic activity as a predictor of weaning failure.

Authors:  Martin Dres; Matthieu Schmidt; Alexis Ferre; Julien Mayaux; Thomas Similowski; Alexandre Demoule
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  An endogenous circadian rhythm of respiratory control in humans.

Authors:  C M Spengler; C A Czeisler; S A Shea
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Response to hypercapnic challenge is associated with successful weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation due to brain stem lesions.

Authors:  Yao-Kuang Wu; Chih-Hsin Lee; Ben-Chang Shia; Ying-Huang Tsai; Thomas C Y Tsao
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Evaluation of indexes predicting the outcome of ventilator weaning and value of adding supplemental inspiratory load.

Authors:  F Gandia; J Blanco
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Extubation failure: diagnostic value of occlusion pressure (P0.1) and P0.1-derived parameters.

Authors:  Rafael Fernandez; Juan Maria Raurich; Teresa Mut; Jesus Blanco; Antonio Santos; Ana Villagra
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.