Potentiation of CCNU activity by misonidazole in metastases.

The KHT sarcoma is a model system in which metastases can be studied in multiple organs without prior clonal selection. The present series of experiments were designed to evaluate and compare the extent of potentiation of chemotherapeutic agent activity by radiosensitizers when KHT sarcoma cells were grown in different anatomical sites. In these studies the effect of combining misonidazole (MISO) and 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU) on KHT lung nodules and ovarian metastases was determined. Ovarian metastases were a consequence of the direct spread of tumor cells growing as lung nodules. Once established, KHT cells in the lungs and ovaries grew with a similar doubling time (1-2 days). Response of tumors at either site to chemotherapy in the presence or absence of a sensitizer was assessed using an in vivo to in vitro excision assay. MISO (1.0 mmol/kg) was administered simultaneously with a range of CCNU doses and survival of clonogenic tumor cells was measured 24 h after treatment. The results demonstrate that the addition of MISO to CCNU treatment potentiated the action of this chemotherapeutic agent at both tumor sites although greater cell kill enhancement occurred in the ovarian metastases. In the lung nodules, when combined with CCNU, a 1.0 mmol/kg dose of MISO was found to yield a dose modifying factor (DMF) of approximately 1.3. The same combination resulted in a DMF of approximately 1.8 in the ovarian metastases. This difference in DMF was not a result of an intrinsic difference in sensitivity to CCNU since cells grown at either site gave rise to the same dose response curve. Rather the difference in dose modification by MISO appears to be a consequence of the larger fraction of radiobiologically hypoxic cells in the ovarian tumors (approximately 50 per cent) than in the lung nodules (approximately 5 per cent) at the time of treatment. These findings suggest the use of drug-sensitizer combinations to treat disseminated disease and provide further evidence for the requirement of hypoxia in chemopotentiation by radiosensitizers.