Literature DB >> 3827679

Trimodal evoked potentials compared with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

B S Giesser, D Kurtzberg, H G Vaughan, J C Arezzo, M L Aisen, C R Smith, N G LaRocca, L C Scheinberg.   

Abstract

Twenty-three patients with the clinical diagnosis of possible multiple sclerosis (MS) were tested with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and trimodal evoked potentials. Fourteen patients showed abnormalities on both MRI scans and at least one evoked potential modality (65%). Four patients had normal MRI scans but at least one abnormality on evoked potential testing (17%). One patient had normal triple evoked potentials with an abnormal MRI result. Four patients had normal results on both MRI and triple evoked potential testing; two of these patients were later found to have immunologic abnormalities in the cerebrospinal fluid consistent with the diagnosis of MS. Combined evoked potential testing was found to have a higher sensitivity than MRI in confirming a diagnosis of MS. Three patients with the clinical diagnosis of definite MS were also tested. All these patients showed abnormalities on evoked potential testing, although one patient had a normal MRI result. Of all 26 patients who were studied, 17 showed abnormal MRI results and 21 showed at least one abnormality on evoked potential testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3827679     DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520150035017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Neurol        ISSN: 0003-9942


  9 in total

1.  Conduction deficits of callosal fibres in early multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  K Schmierer; L Niehaus; S Röricht; B U Meyer
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  A prospective study on the predictive value of CSF oligoclonal bands and MRI in acute isolated neurological syndromes for subsequent progression to multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  E Paolino; E Fainardi; P Ruppi; M R Tola; V Govoni; I Casetta; V C Monetti; E Granieri; M Carreras
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Correlation between multimodal evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  G Comi; V Martinelli; S Medaglini; T Locatelli; M Filippi; N Canal; F Triulzi; A Del Maschio
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L S Honig; W A Sheremata
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Effects of vigabatrin on evoked potentials in dogs.

Authors:  J C Arezzo; C E Schroeder; M S Litwak; D L Steward
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Familial multiple sclerosis: MRI findings in clinically affected and unaffected siblings.

Authors:  P J Tienari; O Salonen; J Wikström; L Valanne; J Palo
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging and multimodal evoked potentials in benign and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Filippi; A Campi; S Mammi; V Martinelli; T Locatelli; G Scotti; S Amadio; N Canal; G Comi
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Diagnostic value of paraclinical tests in multiple sclerosis: relative sensitivities and specificities for reclassification according to the Poser committee criteria.

Authors:  S Beer; K M Rösler; C W Hess
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 9.  Multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  S G Lynch; J W Rose
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.800

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.