Literature DB >> 3826465

HMO membership, copayment, and initiation of care for cancer: a study of working adults.

H P Greenwald.   

Abstract

This study compares diagnosis and commencement of treatment for cancer among persons with fully financed fee-for-service coverage, persons with copaid fee-for-service coverage, and persons in an HMO (health maintenance organization). A total of 242 subjects actively employed at the time of their diagnosis were interviewed, typically within six months of beginning cancer treatment. After sex, age, income, education, residence (urban vs rural), and disease site and stage had been controlled, those who made copayments were found to have waited an average of 1.25 months longer (95 per cent confidence limit (cl) +/- .88) between initial suspicion of illness and obtaining a definitive diagnosis than those with full insurance coverage. Time from diagnosis until the beginning of treatment averaged .83 months longer (95 per cent cl +/- .41) for HMO members than those in fee-for-service. These relations were strongest in income categories equal to or exceeding $20,000 per year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3826465      PMCID: PMC1646935          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.77.4.461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  11 in total

1.  Memory errors in a morbidity survey.

Authors:  A CARTWRIGHT
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1963-01

2.  Delay and noncompliance in cancer detection: a behavioral perspective for health planners.

Authors:  H P Greenwald; S W Becker; M C Nevitt
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc       Date:  1978

3.  How do health-maintenance organizations achieve their "savings"?

Authors:  H S Luft
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Patient incentives and hospital insurance.

Authors:  R S Kaplan; L B Lave
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Comparison of health outcomes at a health maintenance organisation with those of fee-for-service care.

Authors:  J E Ware; R H Brook; W H Rogers; E B Keeler; A R Davies; C D Sherbourne; G A Goldberg; P Camp; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The Rand experiment and economical health care.

Authors:  A C Enthoven
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Contrasts in HMO and fee-for-service performance.

Authors:  C R Gaus; S Cooper; C G Hirschman
Journal:  Soc Secur Bull       Date:  1976-05

8.  Utilization of publicly insured health services in Saskatchewan before, during and after copayment.

Authors:  R G Beck; J M Horne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  The effect of breast self-exam practices and physician examinations on extent of disease at diagnosis.

Authors:  E M Smith; A M Francis; L Polissar
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Does free care improve adults' health? Results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R H Brook; J E Ware; W H Rogers; E B Keeler; A R Davies; C A Donald; G A Goldberg; K N Lohr; P C Masthay; J P Newhouse
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  HMO membership, treatment, and mortality risk among prostatic cancer patients.

Authors:  H P Greenwald; C J Henke
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Post-hospitalization followup appointment-keeping among the medically indigent.

Authors:  C I Kiefe; P L Harrison
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1993-10

3.  Stage of cancer at diagnosis for Medicare HMO and fee-for-service enrollees.

Authors:  G F Riley; A L Potosky; J D Lubitz; M L Brown
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.