Literature DB >> 3823145

Feasibility of the homogeneous head model in the interpretation of neuromagnetic fields.

M S Hämäläinen, J Sarvas.   

Abstract

During the past few years it has been demonstrated that active areas in the human brain can be located by measuring the magnetic fields arising from the electric currents in the neurons. An established model for the conductivity geometry of the head in these studies is the layerwise homogeneous sphere. If, however, the measurement grid is too large or the local radius of curvature of the head is changing rapidly in the measurement area, this simple model may become inadequate. In this paper we investigate the feasibility of replacing the conducting sphere by a homogeneous body having the shape of the brain. We show by a semi-quantitative argument that the homogeneous body model is justified. A numerical procedure for the calculation of the magnetic field is presented with examples of the accuracy that can be obtained. An example of significant differences between the predictions of the homogeneous and sphere models is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3823145     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/32/1/014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  30 in total

1.  Activation of multiple cortical areas in response to somatosensory stimulation: combined magnetoencephalographic and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A Korvenoja; J Huttunen; E Salli; H Pohjonen; S Martinkauppi; J M Palva; L Lauronen; J Virtanen; R J Ilmoniemi; H J Aronen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Localization of early syntactic processes in frontal and temporal cortical areas: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  A D Friederici; Y Wang; C S Herrmann; B Maess; U Oertel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Sensitivity of beamformer source analysis to deficiencies in forward modeling.

Authors:  Olaf Steinsträter; Stephanie Sillekens; Markus Junghoefer; Martin Burger; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Advances in neuromagnetic topography and source localization.

Authors:  G L Romani
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  A Mapping Between Structural and Functional Brain Networks.

Authors:  Jil Meier; Prejaas Tewarie; Arjan Hillebrand; Linda Douw; Bob W van Dijk; Steven M Stufflebeam; Piet Van Mieghem
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2016-03-29

6.  Improved accuracy of MEG localization in the temporal region with inclusion of volume current effects.

Authors:  D F Rose; E Ducla-Soares; S Sato
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Perception of phrase structure in music.

Authors:  Thomas R Knösche; Christiane Neuhaus; Jens Haueisen; Kai Alter; Burkhard Maess; Otto W Witte; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: theory and experiment.

Authors:  D Cohen; B N Cuffin
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Distortion of magnetic evoked fields and surface potentials by conductivity differences at boundaries in brain tissue.

Authors:  J C Huang; C Nicholson; Y C Okada
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Effects of sutures and fontanels on MEG and EEG source analysis in a realistic infant head model.

Authors:  Seok Lew; Danielle D Sliva; Myong-sun Choe; P Ellen Grant; Yoshio Okada; Carsten H Wolters; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.