Literature DB >> 3823128

Analysis of magnetoencephalographic data using the homogeneous sphere model: empirical tests.

B S Janday, S J Swithenby.   

Abstract

The external magnetic fields produced by artificial current dipoles placed in conducting-gel filled spheres, partial spheres and human skulls have been measured. Using a homogeneously conducting sphere model, the dipole parameters have been estimated. Although good quality data fitting is obtainable for a range of positions of the centre of the sphere used in the modelling, the predictions for the dipole obtained with those different assumed positions differ considerably. It is found that the most reliable method of obtaining accurate estimates of the dipole parameters is by taking an average of the predictions of several of the best-fit analyses. The information about the accuracy of the predictions that is obtainable from the fitting routine's residual error parameter is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3823128     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/32/1/016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.

Authors:  Arthur K Liu; Anders M Dale; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Pattern recognition in biomagnetic signals by spatio-temporal correlation and application to the localisation of propagating neuronal activity.

Authors:  K Abraham-Fuchs; W Härer; S Schneider; H Stefan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Improved accuracy of MEG localization in the temporal region with inclusion of volume current effects.

Authors:  D F Rose; E Ducla-Soares; S Sato
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.

Authors:  Ming-Xiong Huang; Tao Song; Donald J Hagler; Igor Podgorny; Veikko Jousmaki; Li Cui; Kathleen Gaa; Deborah L Harrington; Anders M Dale; Roland R Lee; Jeff Elman; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: theory and experiment.

Authors:  D Cohen; B N Cuffin
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Distortion of magnetic evoked fields and surface potentials by conductivity differences at boundaries in brain tissue.

Authors:  J C Huang; C Nicholson; Y C Okada
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.033

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.