Literature DB >> 3819914

Femoral anteversion: assessment based on function axes.

Y Yoshioka, T D Cooke.   

Abstract

This study describes a clinically oriented anatomical assessment of anteversion on 32 cadavers ranging from 61 to 89 years. The method used a three-dimensional reference system based on functional axes of the femur. Each soft tissue-free femur was mounted on an osteometric table and aligned to its functional axes. The long axes were defined as passing from the centre of the femoral head to the femoral attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). A line that ran through the PCL attachment (equal distal origin of this system) and was parallel to a transepicondylar line served as transverse axis. Anteversion of the femur was defined as an angle formed to the transverse axis by a line running through the centre of the femoral head through the midpoint of the narrowest segment of the femoral neck. The measurement mean for anteversion among these specimens was 7.4 degrees with a range from -10.8 degrees (retroversion) to 22.1 degrees. There was no statistical difference in mean values (p less than 0.05) between sexes or between right and left sides of the group; however, there were large variations for anteversions when each side in the same individual was compared (although there was no dominant side). Retroversions were observed in four of 32 femurs (12.5%). No correlation was found between the anteversion in these femurs and rotational geometry at the knee. We compared our data with those obtained by conventional techniques, by which anteversion for each femur was measured after the bone had been placed on a flat surface.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3819914     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100050111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Osteotomies].

Authors:  R M Biedert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Differences in Femoral Torsion Among Various Measurement Methods Increase in Hips With Excessive Femoral Torsion.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Till D Lerch; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Simon D Steppacher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Mechanical axis-derived femoral component rotation in extramedullary total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between femoral transverse axis and transepicondylar axis.

Authors:  Jai-Gon Seo; Young-Wan Moon; Ji-Soon Lim; Se-Jun Park; Sang-Min Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Femoral and tibial torsion measurements in children and adolescents: comparison of MRI and 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiographs.

Authors:  Andrea B Rosskopf; Florian M Buck; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Leonhard E Ramseier
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Strong correlation between the morphology of the proximal femur and the geometry of the distal femoral trochlea.

Authors:  Samantha J Wright; Tim A E J Boymans; Bernd Grimm; Anthony W Miles; Oliver Kessler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The incidence of complications after derotational femoral and/or tibial osteotomies in patellofemoral disorders in adolescents and active young patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso; Julio Domenech-Fernandez; Joan Ferras-Tarrago; Alejandro Rosello-Añon; Robert A Teitge
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.114

7.  Patellofemoral disorders: role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in defining abnormal rotational lower limb alignment.

Authors:  Shital Parikh; Frank R Noyes
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.843

8.  Validation of the femoral anteversion measurement method used in imageless navigation.

Authors:  Glen A Turley; Shahbaz M Y Ahmed; Mark A Williams; Damian R Griffin
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2012-06-08

9.  Femoral bowing plane adaptation to femoral anteversion.

Authors:  Alp Akman; Fahir Demirkan; Nuran Sabir; Murat Oto; Cagdas Yorukoglu; Esat Kiter
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Significant differences in femoral torsion values depending on the CT measurement technique.

Authors:  Peter Kaiser; René Attal; Mark Kammerer; Michael Thauerer; Lea Hamberger; Raul Mayr; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.