Literature DB >> 3819252

Food discard practices of householders.

S J Van Garde, M J Woodburn.   

Abstract

Food discard patterns and reasons were determined for a sample of 243 households in Oregon. Personal interviews were conducted, and 7-day records of discards were collected. Discards over a 3-day period also were collected from a subsample of 50. The householder's estimate of amount, converted from measures to grams using food composition tables, was found to be 97% of the actual grams of food, as weighed in the laboratory. Households discarded an average of 1,587 gm ($2.88) food in a 7-day period on the basis of the 79% completed usable records. Major reasons were poor quality for fruits and vegetables; storage time for meat, fish, and poultry; non-use of leftovers for combination dishes; and plate waste for cereals and dairy products. Twenty-nine percent of the discarded food (by cost) was considered to be unsafe to eat by the householder. Aesthetic factors dominated decisions by the 18- to 25-year age group, but experiences related to food storage were the basis for decisions by half of the respondents more than 65 years old. Discards increased with number of members in the household and were influenced by age of children. Household income was not linearly related to amount of discard. As household refrigerator temperatures increased from 1.7 degrees C to 20 degrees C, the amount of discards also increased. Consumers generally lacked criteria for evaluating the safety of foods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3819252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  5 in total

1.  Caring more about food: The unexpected positive effect of the Covid-19 lockdown on household food management and waste.

Authors:  Ludovica Principato; Luca Secondi; Clara Cicatiello; Giovanni Mattia
Journal:  Socioecon Plann Sci       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.641

Review 2.  Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050.

Authors:  Julian Parfitt; Mark Barthel; Sarah Macnaughton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Local setting influences the quantity of household food waste in mid-sized South African towns.

Authors:  Gamuchirai Chakona; Charlie M Shackleton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Model selection and averaging in the assessment of the drivers of household food waste to reduce the probability of false positives.

Authors:  Matthew James Grainger; Lusine Aramyan; Simone Piras; Thomas Edward Quested; Simone Righi; Marco Setti; Matteo Vittuari; Gavin Bruce Stewart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The quantity of food waste in the garbage stream of southern Ontario, Canada households.

Authors:  Paul van der Werf; Jamie A Seabrook; Jason A Gilliland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.