Literature DB >> 3817812

Does "ring syndrome" exist? An analysis of 207 case reports on patients with a ring autosome.

G Kosztolányi.   

Abstract

Analysis of 207 case reports on patients with ring autosome showed that: Forty patients, a fifth of the total, had extreme growth failure together with an otherwise almost-normal appearance, viz. no major malformation, no specific deletion syndrome, no or only a few unspecific minor anomalies. This phenotype may be regarded as the "ring syndrome", a term proposed by Cote et al. (1981) since it is independent of what chromosome is involved. Severe growth failure, the sole major physical abnormality in the "ring syndrome", was seen significantly more often among patients with ring of larger chromosomes than among patients with a smaller ring, indicating that the greater the chromosome involved in ring formation, the higher is the probability of severe growth failure. Larger ring chromosomes showed significantly more often instability than smaller rings, suggesting that there may be a correlation between ring instability and the size of the chromosome involved. Growth failure was present in significantly more patients with a "labile" ring than with a "stable" ring, indicating that a correlation may exist between ring instability and growth failure. It is suggested that the "ring syndrome" observed in many cases with ring autosome may result from end-to-end fusion of chromosome ends, an event not involving deletion in the genetic sense. It is also suggested that the "ring syndrome" is caused by a continuous generation of secondary aneuploid cells with increased mortality, i.e. structural ring instability which seems to be a function of the size of the chromosome involved. Thus, formation of a ring chromosome in certain cases might be regarded as a "structural mutation", i.e. an alteration in the structure of the genetic material per se, rather than a loss or gain of genetic dosages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3817812     DOI: 10.1007/bf00591082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  18 in total

1.  Derivative chromosomal structures from a ring chromsome 4.

Authors:  R Niss; E Passarge
Journal:  Humangenetik       Date:  1975-05-26

2.  Ring chromosome 4.

Authors:  A McDermott; M A Voyce; D Romain
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Comparative behavior of ring chromosomes.

Authors:  M L Kistenmacher; H H Punnett
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Down syndrome--a disruption of homeostasis.

Authors:  B L Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1983-02

5.  Anatomical analysis of the developmental effects of aneuploidy in man: the Down syndrome.

Authors:  E T Bersu
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1980

6.  The behavior of ring chromosome 13.

Authors:  J J Hoo; U Obermann; H Cramer
Journal:  Humangenetik       Date:  1974

7.  A young girl with ring(18) mosaicism: cytogenetic studies and PEP A mapping.

Authors:  M Rocchi; I Cigui; N Archidiacono; V Pecile; G Porcelli; G Filippi
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  Ring chromosome 4: Wolf syndrome and unspecific developmental anomalies.

Authors:  G Kosztolányi
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Hung       Date:  1985

9.  Ring chromosome 15: phenotype, Ag-NOR analysis, secondary aneuploidy, and associated chromosome instability.

Authors:  D H Ledbetter; V M Riccardi; W W Au; D P Wilson; G P Holmquist
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1980

10.  Ring (15) chromosome.

Authors:  E Yunis; M Leibovici; L Quintero
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  64 in total

1.  Maternal transmission of ring chromosome 21.

Authors:  I Kennerknecht; G Barbi; W Vogel
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Interstitial deletion of proximal 8q including part of the centromere from unbalanced segregation of a paternal deletion/marker karyotype with neocentromere formation at 8p22.

Authors:  R D Burnside; J Ibrahim; C Flora; S Schwartz; J H Tepperberg; P R Papenhausen; P E Warburton
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 3.  Autosomal ring chromosomes in human genetic disorders.

Authors:  Moh-Ying Yip
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2015-04

4.  Three unusual but cytogenetically similar cases with up to five different cell lines involving structural and numerical abnormalities of chromosome 18.

Authors:  Isabel M Carreira; Alexandra Mascarenhas; Eunice Matoso; Ana B Couceiro; Lina Ramos; Andreas Dufke; Marie Mazauric; Rüdiger Stressig; Nadezda Kosyakova; Joana B Melo; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 5.  Neocentromeres: new insights into centromere structure, disease development, and karyotype evolution.

Authors:  Owen J Marshall; Anderly C Chueh; Lee H Wong; K H Andy Choo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  De novo ring chromosome 3: a new case with a mild phenotype.

Authors:  M McKinley; A Colley; P Sinclair; D Donnai; T Andrews
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Rapid identification of multiple supernumerary ring chromosomes with a new FISH technique.

Authors:  C Mackie-Ogilvie; K Waddle; J Mandeville; M J Seller; Z Docherty
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Molecular analysis redefines three human chromosome 14 deletions.

Authors:  R F Wintle; T Costa; R H Haslam; I E Teshima; D W Cox
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Chromosome r(10)(p15.3q26.12) in a newborn child: case report.

Authors:  Cecilia Gunnarsson; Barbara Graffmann; Jon Jonasson
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 10.  Ring chromosome 10: report on two patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  Roberta Santos Guilherme; Chong Ae Kim; Luis Garcia Alonso; Rachel S Honjo; Vera Ayres Meloni; Denise Maria Christofolini; Leslie Domenici Kulikowski; Maria Isabel Melaragno
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.