Literature DB >> 3817389

Comparative stimulation of motilin duodenal receptor by porcine or canine motilin.

P Poitras, R G Lahaie, S St-Pierre, L Trudel.   

Abstract

Motilins purified from porcine and canine intestine differ in their amino acid composition in positions 7-8-12-13-14. We studied in vitro the contractile response of longitudinal duodenal muscles from various animals (guinea pig, rabbit, dog) to porcine and canine synthetic motilins. Both substances failed to elicit contraction of the guinea pig duodenum but were active and equally potent on rabbit muscle. In dogs, porcine motilin was inactive at the concentrations tested (up to 10(-4) M) whereas canine motilin induced duodenal contractions in a dose-response fashion (mean dose required to induce half-maximal response: 4.82 +/- 0.25 X 10(-5) M). The contraction generated by synthetic canine motilin (10(-5) M) was not influenced by atropine, hexamethonium, tetrodotoxin, naloxone, or sodium nitroprusside (all used at 10(-4) M) but was blocked by verapamil (10(-4)). Our study shows that species-related structural alterations in motilin molecules generate different bioactive capacities in some animal species, suggests that the middle portion of the molecule is important for its bioactive expression, suggests the presence of motilin receptors on canine duodenal muscle, and suggests that an influx of extracellular calcium is involved in the canine duodenal muscle contraction elicited by canine motilin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3817389     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90014-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  8 in total

1.  Involvement of two different pathways in the motor effects of erythromycin on the gastric antrum in humans.

Authors:  B Coulie; J Tack; T Peeters; J Janssens
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Stimulating action of KW-5139 (Leu13-motilin) on gastrointestinal motility in the rabbit.

Authors:  T Kitazawa; S Ichikawa; T Yokoyama; A Ishii; K Shuto
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Effects of motilin and mitemcinal (GM-611) on gastrointestinal contractile activity in rhesus monkeys in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Kenji Yogo; Ken-Ichi Ozaki; Hisanori Takanashi; Masao Koto; Zen Itoh; Satoshi Omura
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Motilin and erythromycin enhance the in vitro contractile activity of the sphincter of Oddi of the Australian brush-tailed possum.

Authors:  R A Baker; G T Saccone; D Costi; A Thune; J Toouli
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of SK-896, a new human motilin analogue, in healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Furuta; Yukiharu Nakayama; Mitsuyoshi Nakashima; Yoshio Suzuki
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Effects of oral mitemcinal (GM-611), erythromycin, EM-574 and cisapride on gastric emptying in conscious rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Kenji Yogo; Mitsu Onoma; Ken-Ichi Ozaki; Masao Koto; Zen Itoh; Satoshi Omura; Hisanori Takanashi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Why is motilin active in some studies with mice, rats, and guinea pigs, but not in others? Implications for functional variability among rodents.

Authors:  Gareth J Sanger
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2022-04

Review 8.  Motilin Comparative Study: Structure, Distribution, Receptors, and Gastrointestinal Motility.

Authors:  Takio Kitazawa; Hiroyuki Kaiya
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 5.555

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.