Literature DB >> 3816730

Type of disinfectant in drinking water and patterns of mortality in Massachusetts.

S Zierler, R A Danley, L Feingold.   

Abstract

Chlorination has been the major strategy for disinfection of drinking water in the United States. Concern about the potential health effects of the reaction by-products of chlorine has prompted use of alternative strategies. One such method is chloramination, a treatment process that does not appear to have carcinogenic by-products, but may have less potent biocidal activity than chlorination. We examined the patterns of mortality of residents in Massachusetts who died between 1969 and 1983 and lived in communities using drinking water that was disinfected either by chlorine or chloramine. Comparison of type of disinfectant among 51,645 cases of deaths due to selected cancer sites and 214,988 controls who died from cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, or pulmonary disease, or from lymphatic cancer showed small variation in the patterns of mortality. Bladder cancer was moderately associated with residence at death in a chlorinated community (mortality odds ratio = 1.7, 95% confidence interval = 1.3-2.2) in a logistic regression analysis using controls who died from lymphatic cancer. A slight excess of deaths from pneumonia and influenza was observed in communities whose residents drank chloraminated water compared to residents from chlorinated communities, as well as to all Massachusetts residents (standardized mortality ratio = 118, 95% confidence interval = 116-120 for chloraminated communities, and standardized mortality ratio = 98, 95% confidence interval = 95-100 for chlorinated communities). These results are intended to be preliminary and crude descriptions of the relationship under study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3816730      PMCID: PMC1474331          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8669275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  6 in total

1.  Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies.

Authors:  O Miettinen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  An alternative to the proportionate mortality ratio.

Authors:  O S Miettinen; J D Wang
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Drinking water and cancer in Louisiana. A retrospective mortality study.

Authors:  M S Gottlieb; J K Carr; J R Clarkson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Drinking water and cancer incidence in Iowa. I. Trends and incidence by source of drinking water and size of municipality.

Authors:  J A Bean; P Isacson; W J Hausler; J Kohler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Associations of cancer mortality with halomethanes in drinking water.

Authors:  K P Cantor; R Hoover; T J Mason; L J McCabe
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Drinking water treatment and risk of cancer death in Wisconsin.

Authors:  M S Kanarek; T B Young
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of studies on individual consumption of chlorinated drinking water and bladder cancer.

Authors:  C M Villanueva; F Fernández; N Malats; J O Grimalt; M Kogevinas
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Chlorination, chlorination by-products, and cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  R D Morris; A M Audet; I F Angelillo; T C Chalmers; F Mosteller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Chlorination disinfection by-products and pancreatic cancer risk.

Authors:  Minh T Do; Nicholas J Birkett; Kenneth C Johnson; Daniel Krewski; Paul Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Intrauterine growth retardation in Iowa communities with herbicide-contaminated drinking water supplies.

Authors:  R Munger; P Isacson; S Hu; T Burns; J Hanson; C F Lynch; K Cherryholmes; P Van Dorpe; W J Hausler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Case control study of the geographic variability of exposure to disinfectant byproducts and risk for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Gerald E Bove; Peter A Rogerson; John E Vena
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 3.918

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.