Literature DB >> 3816718

Results of toxicological testing of Jefferson Parish pilot plant samples.

R G Miller, F C Kopfler, L W Condie, M A Pereira, J R Meier, H P Ringhand, M Robinson, B C Casto.   

Abstract

Five toxicological tests were performed using concentrated drinking water samples collected at a pilot-scale drinking water treatment plant that had streams treated with different disinfectants (no disinfectant, ozone, chlorine dioxide, monochloramine, or chlorine) before treatment with granular activated carbon (GAC). The toxicological tests used in this study were the Ames Salmonella assay, a subchronic in vivo toxicity assay in mice, the SENCAR mouse skin initiation-promotion assay, a rat liver foci assay, and the lung adenoma assay in strain A mice. These tests were conducted to determine the general toxicity and the mutagenic/carcinogenic potential associated with the use of disinfection and/or GAC in the treatment of drinking water. The stability of the mutagenic activity of the samples tested was determined by repeated analysis using the Ames Salmonella assay. Results indicated that the samples remained mutagenic for the duration of the tests. All the drinking water concentrates (4000 X) prepared by the XAD resin adsorption procedure failed to provide statistically significant indication of carcinogenic activity in the SENCAR mouse, rat liver foci, and the lung adenoma assays. However, concentrates of the chlorine, chlorine dioxide, and monochloramine treated waters gave consistent mutagenic responses in the Ames Salmonella assay. GAC was effective for 6 months in removing both the mutagenicity of chlorine-treated water and the potential of water to become mutagenic when treated with chlorine. In the in vivo, subchronic 30-day toxicity test in mice, some statistically significant differences in organ weights and body weights of animals exposed to different concentrates of some of the samples were observed. However, a consistent pattern of these differences indicating overt toxicity was not detected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3816718      PMCID: PMC1474337          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8669129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  4 in total

Review 1.  Lung tumors in mice: application to carcinogenesis bioassay.

Authors:  M B Shimkin; G D Stoner
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 6.242

2.  Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test.

Authors:  B N Ames; J Mccann; E Yamasaki
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Intracellular phospholipases A.

Authors:  H van den Bosch
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1980-09-30

4.  Short-term in vivo initiation/promotion bioassay for hepatocarcinogens.

Authors:  J O Ford; M A Pereira
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol       Date:  1980-11
  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Chlorination or ozonation?

Authors:  P A Chapdelaine
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Disinfection of model indicator organisms in a drinking water pilot plant by using PEROXONE.

Authors:  R L Wolfe; M H Stewart; S Liang; M J McGuire
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The effects of subacute exposure of peracetic Acid on lipid peroxidation and hepatic enzymes in wistar rats.

Authors:  Abdoljalal Marjani; Mohammad J Golalipour; Anneh M Gharravi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2010-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.