Literature DB >> 3815369

Phase I/pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal cisplatin and etoposide.

S Zimm, S M Cleary, W E Lucas, R J Weiss, M Markman, P A Andrews, M A Schiefer, S Kim, C Horton, S B Howell.   

Abstract

We administered cisplatin and etoposide by peritoneal dialysis to 39 patients with i.p. malignancies in order to investigate the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of this 2-drug combination. All patients received i.v. sodium thiosulfate concurrently with the i.p. chemotherapy. Myelosuppression, nausea, vomiting, and malaise were the primary toxicities encountered. The maximum tolerated dose of etoposide was 350 mg/m2, when administered with a fixed dose of cisplatin, 200 mg/m2. Although the total (free and protein-bound) etoposide exposure for the peritoneal cavity was only 1.5-fold greater than that for the plasma, the free (non-protein bound) etoposide peritoneal exposure was 65-fold greater than the plasma. Tumor regressions were noted in patients with ovarian and pancreatic carcinomas. This study is the first demonstration of the large pharmacokinetic advantage that exists for the i.p. administration of highly protein-bound drugs, and it also documents the clinical activity of i.p. cisplatin and etoposide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3815369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  27 in total

1.  Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  S Zimm
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-09

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Csilla Hasovits; Stephen Clarke
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Paclitaxel-loaded polymeric microparticles: quantitative relationships between in vitro drug release rate and in vivo pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Max Tsai; Ze Lu; M Guillaume Wientjes; Jessie L-S Au
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 4.  Etoposide and teniposide. Bioanalysis, metabolism and clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J J Holthuis
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1988-06-17

5.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal thioTEPA in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  C Lewis; N Lawson; E M Rankin; G Morrison; A B MacLean; J Cordiner; J Cassidy; D J Kerr; S B Kaye
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Near-infrared fluorescent imaging of metastatic ovarian cancer using folate receptor-targeted high-density lipoprotein nanocarriers.

Authors:  Ian R Corbin; Kenneth K Ng; Lili Ding; Andrea Jurisicova; Gang Zheng
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 5.307

7.  Multiscale tumor spatiokinetic model for intraperitoneal therapy.

Authors:  Jessie L-S Au; Peng Guo; Yue Gao; Ze Lu; Michael G Wientjes; Max Tsai; M Guillaume Wientjes
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Tumor-penetrating microparticles for intraperitoneal therapy of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ze Lu; Max Tsai; Dan Lu; Jie Wang; M Guillaume Wientjes; Jessie L-S Au
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Phase 2 trial of chronic low-dose oral etoposide as salvage therapy of platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M Markman; T Hakes; B Reichman; J Curtin; R Barakat; S Rubin; W Jones; J L Lewis; L Almadrones; W Hoskins
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 10.  Then and now: cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), a historical perspective.

Authors:  Madalyn G Neuwirth; H Richard Alexander; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.