Literature DB >> 3813865

Reducing wound infections. Improved gown and drape barrier performance.

J A Moylan, K T Fitzpatrick, K E Davenport.   

Abstract

A 21-month study involving 2181 clean and clean-contaminated general surgical procedures was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially available disposable gown and drape system vs a cotton system in reducing wound infection. The series in which the disposable spun-laced fiber system was used had a significantly lower overall infection rate (2.83% vs 6.5%) as well as better rates in clean (1.8% vs 3.8%) and clean-contaminated (4.8% vs 11.4%) procedures. This effect was independent of all other factors. The odds of developing a wound infection was 2 1/2 times higher with a cotton system than with a disposable system. Actual cost analysis from three types of hospitals showed lower costs with utilization of disposable gown and drape systems. Hospital charges were significantly higher for those patients developing wound infections. The results of the study demonstrated not only significant reduction in wound infection rates but also major cost savings when a disposable gown and drape system was used in the operating room.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3813865     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400140034003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  8 in total

Review 1.  Gloves, gowns and masks for reducing the transmission of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the hospital setting.

Authors:  Jesús López-Alcalde; Marta Mateos-Mazón; Marcela Guevara; Lucieni O Conterno; Ivan Solà; Sheila Cabir Nunes; Xavier Bonfill Cosp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-16

2.  Surgical waste audit of 5 total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Nathan M Stall; Yoan M Kagoma; Jennifer N Bondy; Douglas Naudie
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Isolation gowns in health care settings: Laboratory studies, regulations and standards, and potential barriers of gown selection and use.

Authors:  F Selcen Kilinc Balci
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  Non-woven, disposable theatre gowns for 'high-risk' surgery.

Authors:  D R Jones; R Harris; K Wilson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  [IKOP-Infection control in the operating theatreConsensus on the theme "Barrier measures during operations and invasive procedures"].

Authors:  B Salzberger; M Dettenkofer; F M Baer; O Cornely; M Herrmann; J Höher; S Lemmen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Sterile Parts of Operating Gown during Lower Limb Joint Replacement Surgery.

Authors:  Mohamad Qoreishi; Mohammadreza Abbasian; Farshad Safdari
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-07

Review 7.  Does the type of surgical drape (disposable versus non-disposable) affect the risk of subsequent surgical site infection?

Authors:  David C Kieser; Michael C Wyatt; Andrew Beswick; Setor Kunutsor; Gary J Hooper
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

8.  Factors contributing to airborne particle dispersal in the operating room.

Authors:  Chieko Noguchi; Hironobu Koseki; Hidehiko Horiuchi; Akihiko Yonekura; Masato Tomita; Takashi Higuchi; Shinya Sunagawa; Makoto Osaki
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.