Literature DB >> 3813056

Body mass and spread of spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine.

M T Pitkänen.   

Abstract

The effect of body mass on spinal anesthesia with isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine was examined in 90 patients. The first 50 patients received 3 ml isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine. Another 40 patients, selected at random to receive 3 ml of either hyperbaric or isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%, were then studied. Levels of pin-prick analgesia and motor block were tested during induction, surgery, and recovery. The effects of high spinal anesthesia on peak expiratory flow (PEF) and arterial blood gas tensions were also examined in the last 40 patients. With isobaric bupivacaine, persons with higher than normal BMI [body mass index = weight (kg) divided by height-squared (m2)], or persons who were shorter than normal had higher cephalad spread of anesthesia. With hyperbaric bupivacaine only shorter individuals developed higher levels of anesthesia. Because of considerable interindividual variability, however, these observations are of only limited clinical value in predicting the spread of bupivacaine spinal analgesia. The higher spread of analgesia was associated with a decrease in PEF, whereas, the blood gas tensions remained undisturbed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3813056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  13 in total

1.  No sensory block with spinal bupivacaine a case report.

Authors:  A Stav; L Ovadia; L Keslin; N Weksler
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine for transurethral endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Secil Dizman; Gurkan Turker; Alp Gurbet; Elif Basagan Mogol; Suat Turkcan; Ziyaatin Karakuzu
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2011-08

3.  The effect of body mass index on the spread of spinal block in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kari A Leino; Kristiina S Kuusniemi; Heikki K Pälve; Hannu T Tiusanen; Tapani T Tuppurainen
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Comparison of two spinal needle types to achieve a unilateral spinal block.

Authors:  Kristiina Kuusniemi; Kari Leino; Kaarlo Lertola; Kalevi Pihlajamäki; Mikko Pitkänen
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  [Secondary cranial extension after spinal anesthesia with isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine following postural change].

Authors:  O Vicent; R J Litz; M Hübler; T Koch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  The Levels and Duration of Sensory and Motor Blockades of Spinal Anesthesia in Obese Patients That Underwent Urological Operations in the Lithotomy Position.

Authors:  Taner Ciftci; Ali Bestemi Kepekci; Hatice Pınar Yavasca; Hayrettin Daskaya; Volkan İnal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Obesity is independently associated with spinal anesthesia outcomes: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Hyo-Jin Kim; Won Ho Kim; Hyung Woo Lim; Jie Ae Kim; Duk-Kyung Kim; Byung Seop Shin; Woo Seog Sim; Tae Soo Hahm; Chung Su Kim; Sangmin M Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Regional anesthesia and obesity.

Authors:  Jay B Brodsky; Harry J M Lemmens
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.479

9.  Abdominal girth and vertebral column length can adjust spinal anesthesia for lower limb surgery, a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Qing-he Zhou; Bo Zhu; Chang-na Wei; Min Yan
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Intra-abdominal pressure, vertebral column length, and spread of spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing cesarean section: An observational study.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Ni; Ying Zhou; An-Cui Yong; Lu Wang; Qing-He Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.